From: "Thhoep" <thhoep@gmx.de>
To: Ramin Dousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Iproute2 and fwmark usage
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:02:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001501c3d6fc$3a889c80$1684188d@Kiste> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 006501c3d6f7$d96ecf90$1684188d@Kiste
> i just tried over an hour to bring a tunnel up on one of my other servers,
> so i can simulate routing behaviour with it, but just wasted my time with
> trying to fix a broken ppp installation on it. dont have the patience and
> gotten way too tired to do that right now. so i give you the configuration
> of my testing setup and if you would like to reproduce it i would
appreciate
> it.
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth4 -s 192.168.0.22 -j
MARK --set-mark 1
>
damn, forgot the masquerading rule here:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp4 -j MASQUERADE
> ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth4 table test
>
> ip rule add fwmark 1 table test
> OR
> ip rule add from 192.168.0.22 table test
>
> (these ones done in the ppp ip-up script)
>
> ip route add <remote ip> dev <ppp iface> src <local ip>
> ip route add default via <remote ip> dev <ppp iface>
>
> (dont use a default route in the main table to the same ppp iface, so you
> feel a difference when the routing rules apply or not)
>
>
> thats all i think.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 23:05 Iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
2004-01-09 16:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:17 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 17:35 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 19:42 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 19:06 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 20:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 20:09 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 21:22 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 21:30 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 22:02 ` Thhoep [this message]
2004-01-11 20:57 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 21:07 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-11 21:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:12 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:22 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-13 23:46 ` Thhoep
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-08 14:20 Filter out broadcast messages Gabby James
2004-01-08 14:31 ` iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001501c3d6fc$3a889c80$1684188d@Kiste' \
--to=thhoep@gmx.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.