From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "mdpeters" Subject: transparent bridge troubles? Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:14:13 -0500 Message-ID: <001501c4f4f5$749ae690$3e0010ac@esonet18> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Here is the output you requested: #/usr/local/sbin/iptables -vnxL Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1177615 packets, 73906075 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source = destination Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source = destination 0 0 QUEUE tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 = 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x16/0x02 state NEW 0 0 QUEUE tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 = 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 0 0 QUEUE udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 = 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 QUEUE icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 = 0.0.0.0/0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 2283371 packets, 3277380013 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source = destination I am queuing all of the packets to a userspace daemon for Snort-inline = to process. If Snort is the problem then could you advise me on the = iptables to pass everything through the transparent bridge to eliminate = it from the equation? Best regards, Michael