From: <mjoachimiak@poczta.onet.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:30:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001601c46f40$1ae657f0$0802a8c0@monster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FDBC05.4010903@cfl.rr.com>
No i didnt but I've seen that is possible to get ftp into one class and rest
traffic to the other class while using tc + htb.
My traffic shaping is done by ip.
>Have you tried limiting the maximum outgoing bandwidth in proftpd
>itself?
-----Original Message-----
From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]
On Behalf Of mjoachimiak@poczta.onet.pl
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:25 AM
To: lartc; nix4me
Subject: Re: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
I coud possibly help but I'm using tc + htb and dont know anything about
wondershaper. If you want a script I could do it for you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "nix4me" <nix4me@cfl.rr.com>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
> Hi,
>
> I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux.
> I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is
> connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a
> switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box.
>
> On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send
> speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K it slows down all
> surfing on the entire network.
>
> I have tried running wondershaper-htb on the ipcop firewall and it
> limits my upload speed, but it still seems to slow down everything
else
> a little bit. I notice a slow www experience however my ping times
are
> good.
>
> Is there a simple way to just put a limit on the traffic coming from
the
> passive ports (50000-51000) from my proftpd computer? I just want to
> set a limit on ftp and not affect anything else.
>
> I have looked at all the documentation and I must admit that I dont
> understand any of it. It all seems to be too complicated for my
needs.
>
> I hope someone out there is doing what I am trying to do.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-21 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-21 0:42 [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic nix4me
2004-07-21 14:25 ` mjoachimiak
2004-07-21 15:22 ` Piszcz, Justin Michael
2004-07-21 15:35 ` Horst Graffy
2004-07-21 16:30 ` mjoachimiak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001601c46f40$1ae657f0$0802a8c0@monster' \
--to=mjoachimiak@poczta.onet.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.