From: "Subhash Jadavani" <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: 'Dolev Raviv' <draviv@codeaurora.org>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its already added
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:29:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001601cfd857$cb656d10$62304730$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140924163829.GA9474@infradead.org>
> Ok. Can you move the is_visible check to scsi_sysfs_add_devices, should
be fine to place it just after the sdev_state check.
Sure, will move it in next patch.
-----Original Message-----
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:38 AM
To: Subhash Jadavani
Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'Dolev Raviv';
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org;
santoshsy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its
already added
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:27:47AM -0700, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> No, It happens in this sequence of events:
> 1. LLD calls the __scsi_add_device() for well known logical units
> before
> scsi_scan_host() (This is done as part of [PATCH V5 10/17] scsi: ufs:
> manually add well known logical units). __scsi_add_device() will also
> add the scsi device to sysfs by calling scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() 2. Now
> LDD calls the scsi_scan_host() (Note that CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is
> enabled) which will schedule the async scan. Device reports only
> normal LUs (no w-lus reported here) when REPORT LUNs in sent with
> SELECT REPORT cleared. At the end of async scan,
> scsi_finish_async_scan() calls scsi_sysfs_add_devices().
> scsi_sysfs_add_devices() iterates through all the scsi_device
> instances attached to Scsi_Host hence end up calling
> scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() 2nd time for the scsi_device which were already
> added explicitly by LDD.
Ok. Can you move the is_visible check to scsi_sysfs_add_devices, should be
fine to place it just after the sdev_state check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 15:13 [PATCH/RESEND V5 00/17] UFS: Power management support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH V5 01/17] scsi: fixing the "type" for well known LUs Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 20:49 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-25 6:18 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its already added Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 16:27 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 16:38 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2014-09-25 0:29 ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 03/17] scsi: ufs: Allow vendor specific initialization Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 04/17] scsi: ufs: Add regulator enable support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 05/17] scsi: ufs: Add clock initialization support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 06/17] scsi: ufs: add voting support for host controller power Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 07/17] scsi: ufs: refactor query descriptor API support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 08/17] scsi: ufs: improve init sequence Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 09/17] scsi: ufs: Active Power Mode - configuring bActiveICCLevel Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH V5 10/17] scsi: ufs: manually add well known logical units Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 16:36 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 16:40 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2014-09-24 16:59 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH V5 11/17] scsi: ufs: add UFS power management support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 23:11 ` Akinobu Mita
2014-09-25 10:35 ` Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 12/17] scsi: ufs: refactor configuring power mode Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 13/17] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock gating Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 14/17] scsi: ufs: Add freq-table-hz property for UFS device Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 15/17] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock scaling using devfreq framework Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 16/17] scsi: ufs: tune bkops while power managment events Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 17/17] scsi: ufs: definitions for phy interface Dolev Raviv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001601cfd857$cb656d10$62304730$@codeaurora.org' \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=draviv@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santoshsy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.