From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Simo" Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 08:25:23 +0000 Subject: AW: [LARTC] Traffic Shaping Message-Id: <001a01c79081$426366a0$c72a33e0$@de> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2107866308==" List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. --===============2107866308== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C79092.05EC36A0" Content-Language: de Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C79092.05EC36A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rangi, Bandwidth ist important, but VoIP needs more than this. Voice traffic needs low latency of packets. That's why traffic shaping maybe not lose your problem. in this a HFCS queuing descipline is used instead of HTB, because this can separate between bandwidth and delay. For more Information about this can you find here: http://linux-ip.net/articles/hfsc.en/ bye Simo Von: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl] Im Auftrag von Rangi Biddle Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 22:15 An: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Betreff: [LARTC] Traffic Shaping Dear List, I am wanting to perform some traffic shaping as the subject of this email suggests. What I am wanting to do is this; I would like to have traffic shaping performed on the following protocols: HTTP, RDP, GRE, PPTP, SIP and IAX. Obviously I would like to have highest priority set for voice packets so much so that the general http traffic does not impede on the voice packets. I would like to have ample bandwidth available for RDP so that I am able to connect to a remote site and not have too much lag but ample enough that most tasks can be done. HTTP traffic would possibly have the lowest priority of all the protocols that I have listed. So to clarify priority would be something such as this: 1. IAX 2. SIP 3. GRE 4. PPTP 5. RDP 6. HTTP I have a linux gateway that I will use for performing the traffic shaping and is setup in the following way: ------------- ------------ --------- | ADSL | <----------> | LINUX | <----------> | LAN | ------------- ------------ --------- I plan to have the ADSL router forward all traffic to the linux gateway using something similar to a BIMAP rule where all incoming and outgoing traffic is made to appear to come from the public IP address. I welcome any and all suggestions but would possibly prefer the most elegant of solutions J Many thanks in advance Rangi ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C79092.05EC36A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi = Rangi,

Bandwidth ist important, but VoIP needs more than this. Voice traffic needs low = latency of packets. That’s why traffic shaping maybe not lose your problem. = &= nbsp;

in this = a HFCS queuing descipline is used instead of HTB, because this can separate between = bandwidth and delay. For more Information about this can you find here: http://linux-ip.net/articl= es/hfsc.en/

bye

Simo

Von:<= /b> lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl] = Im Auftrag von Rangi Biddle
Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 22:15
An: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Betreff: [LARTC] Traffic Shaping

Dear List,

I am wanting to perform some = traffic shaping as the subject of this email suggests.

What I am wanting to do is = this; I would like to have traffic shaping performed on the following = protocols: HTTP, RDP, GRE, PPTP, SIP and IAX. Obviously I would like to have = highest priority set for voice packets so much so that the general http traffic = does not impede on the voice packets. I would like to have ample = bandwidth available for RDP so that I am able to connect to a remote site and not = have too much lag but ample enough that most tasks can be done. HTTP = traffic would possibly have the lowest priority of all the protocols that I have listed. So to clarify priority would be something such as = this:

1.       IAX

2.       SIP

3.       GRE

4.       PPTP

5.       RDP

6.       HTTP

I have a linux gateway that I = will use for performing the traffic shaping and is setup in the following = way:

          =       -------------         =             &= nbsp;   ------------          &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;    ---------

          =       |    ADSL     | <----------> |   LINUX | <----------> | LAN   |

          =        -------------          =             &= nbsp; ------------          &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;    ---------

I plan to have the ADSL router = forward all traffic to the linux gateway using something similar to a BIMAP rule = where all incoming and outgoing traffic is made to appear to come from the public = IP address. I welcome any and all suggestions but would possibly = prefer the most elegant of solutions J

Many thanks in = advance

Rangi

------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C79092.05EC36A0-- --===============2107866308== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc --===============2107866308==--