From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4776BC43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 15:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A831206A3 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 15:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="nir+Uytf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1A831206A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jKO7N-0002Ap-PT; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:20:25 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jKO7M-0002Aj-GF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:20:24 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: a371f89a-75be-11ea-b4f4-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id a371f89a-75be-11ea-b4f4-bc764e2007e4; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id i19so8161923wmb.0 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=paZCOymGUO3uhYNh9MBt/YSXWrRalqdxRoI1h3RgPoU=; b=nir+Uytfzgd1nRefyAn0sRuNLpRqDNi+9OfW3hTNnPi/Yu+FJlhhXW6/NemAPGWPPH K0rSJi6jQWhr4OZjZxnbSxprl5fr7/N9xBV9ywS+sumIwuy8n0l/TqF17dIJcTQBhts/ Qy1HYcuw1AXvfHbY/BfIkdPwJimV68p4bhA7+Szt0k+WtYrZBMYODJ+J42N7D2JYOgqP F072fztnCOfj8xN8TzrHha0guJbYgOSwNsuYaX4hxDWnKEw5atxm+MptZDUSfUjowDZ7 n1gIpVGtPjt2hsWG50Wvr0LFIx93nHQWeuxnaJF8QZAKO773gpP6y51OUlqa9LgYi54m st+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:thread-index; bh=paZCOymGUO3uhYNh9MBt/YSXWrRalqdxRoI1h3RgPoU=; b=iA4kyciCKZAb8C2tOhDmD5Ht18mQI103gixfdvl97s2Zepa4V3smNhCVQrni7yiQDH SqXNuXNrZDY+y6PeVnx5JH5x7RxYNR5ZhG6+aaW7rd5CrtcRKtsBG+sYeYBc165iFs/Z tgHhNif9fu9L4m5JrEv1u/PzUsmCVGPETgmkqks6faEUf1kBAaEVJMSIux3Wd6ccvmWM r0aSNjUO/7jZJ5GtDijVdvW9u61txfjWi2qP4CrIMRcVUPU3Si0i6fzBr8u41xuQTulq R036ZCgsDrfGMyjB4u5S7I1n0X8STcwlz6pzqqr40Y2MQ/6vjN4llfzUWeRCGNU8/osI G5Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubSnhb3ST0aA7HHai3IO01f+PjZ+sATbpddrbuSwGPkP2mGch6R +tfuWo3OS86De1uSkE43WKH9W3veih0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLqhwP7eASMSRAAvkljQv0c+We1ZmIbxAbmK+bLdsXWQO9TUrFOCHj5TTVncx/W5l0Wr4GtPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:220f:: with SMTP id z15mr9712527wml.185.1585927223054; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CBGR90WXYV0 ([54.239.6.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm477168wrv.18.2020.04.03.08.20.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:20:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Durrant X-Google-Original-From: "Paul Durrant" To: "'Jan Beulich'" References: <20200327185012.1795-1-paul@xen.org> <20200327185012.1795-4-paul@xen.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain context Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: <001e01d609cb$64913fa0$2db3bee0$@xen.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: en-gb Thread-Index: AQG3I8TZM/MLMEc/e2It3WEXPZVs8AIR6g5qAoK3rZqogKoVMA== X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: paul@xen.org Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, 'Ian Jackson' , 'Wei Liu' Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: 30 March 2020 11:54 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain context > > On 27.03.2020 19:50, Paul Durrant wrote: > > This tools is analogous to 'xen-hvmctx' which presents HVM context. > > Subsequent patches will add 'dump' functions when new records are > > introduced. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant > > --- > > Cc: Ian Jackson > > Cc: Wei Liu > > --- > > .gitignore | 1 + > > tools/misc/Makefile | 4 ++ > > tools/misc/xen-ctx.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Is xen-ctx a good choice of a name, considering we already have not > only xen-hvmctx, but also xenctx? If the new functionality isn't a > good fit for either, perhaps its name would better reflect its > connection to save/restore records? xen-sr-dump looks pretty clumsy > to me, but still seems better than a name easily mixed up with > others. How about xen-domctx? Paul > > Jan