From: "Milo Medin " <mmedin@m2znetworks.com>
To: 'Mark Lord' <mlord@pobox.com>, 'Milo Medin' <medin@m2znetworks.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: FW: ICH10R PMP support
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:13:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002101c8d658$4e9bf950$ebd3ebf0$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48609E28.8040300@pobox.com>
Thanks. Just to confirm, non highpoint 88SX7042 based cards don't have this issue right? This seems silly for them to do such a thing, but some people like their management tools...
Thanks
Milo
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Lord [mailto:mlord@pobox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:12 AM
To: Milo Medin
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: ICH10R PMP support
Milo Medin wrote:
> Mark, thanks very much for the reply. Sounds like the 88SX7042 is a good solution. A couple more questions:
>
> 1) There seems to be talk on the mailing list about a bug where on highpoint controllers using this chip the controller corrupts some data on non-raid disk members. I assume this is caused by the specific firmware on highpoint controllers using this chip, and that if I use a non highpoint version of the 88SX7042 that I won't see this problem.
..
The firmware on the Highpoint RAID cards unconditionally overwrites
sectors on any attached drives, before booting any O/S.
Never plug a drive that already has data on it into any Highpoint RAID card.
But for new drives, just partition around the firmware areas and you'll be fine.
There are notes (and a WARNING) in the driver source code regarding those.
Avoid sectors 1..63 (cannot boot from this controller as a result),
and avoid the final (full!) GB of each drive.
> 2) You said this is the best marvell solution for Linux at this time. Is there a better SATA controller that I should be thinking about other than the 88SX7042? I know the ICH9R's had good performance, but no FIS switching for PMP's.
..
Dunno. I think everyone in the biz is going to AHCI style controllers now.
Cheers
--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
mlord@pobox.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-25 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 3:04 FW: ICH10R PMP support Milo Medin
2008-06-23 9:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-06-23 9:56 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-24 7:04 ` Mark Lord
2008-06-24 7:10 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-24 7:15 ` Mark Lord
2008-06-24 9:40 ` Brad Campbell
2008-06-23 15:54 ` Milo Medin
2008-06-24 7:11 ` Mark Lord
2008-06-25 0:13 ` Milo Medin [this message]
[not found] <OF1CA00FC2.4783C0D2-ON85257471.0053BCDF-85257471.0053FA0F@applera.com>
2008-06-24 7:08 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002101c8d658$4e9bf950$ebd3ebf0$@com' \
--to=mmedin@m2znetworks.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=medin@m2znetworks.com \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.