From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750892AbWA2Khq (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:37:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750893AbWA2Khq (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:37:46 -0500 Received: from [207.253.5.75] ([207.253.5.75]:5903 "EHLO imailserver.sicon-sr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750876AbWA2Khp (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:37:45 -0500 Message-ID: <002201c624bf$fdcc83b0$1701a8c0@gerold> From: "Gerold van Dijk" To: Cc: , "Alwin" , "oswin martopawiro" , "guno" , "albert" References: <000601c62370$db00cd50$1701a8c0@gerold> <200601271852.k0RIqaC0023706@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Subject: Re: traceroute bug ? Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:37:23 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1289 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1289 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear Valdis et.al., thanks for biting! I really tested this thing thoroughly, with different distributions (Red Hat, SuSE 8.0 and 10.0) on different machines with the firewalls completely open, and without any router or switch involved: cross cable straight from one machine to another! IF I ONLY CHANGE TO ANOTHER IP BLOCK (E.G. 206.253.5.64/24) OR A PRIVATE RANGE (E.G. 192.168.1.0/24) THE TRACEROUTE WORKS FINE! SO IT IS SPECIFICALLY THIS 207.253.5.0/24 BLOCK THAT DOES NOT TRACEROUTE WITHIN IT'S OWN RANGE! Not only the subnetwork 207.253.5.64/27 but the whole class C block 207.253.5.0/24 !? Just to be complete: we CAN ping normally within this network! But the traceroute simple displays "* * *" row after row! Of course it is not that urgent a problem, cause what is the sense of doing a traceroute within your own network anyway? But I thought it might be useful to report this strange thing! Thank you all for your time! Regards, Gerold H. van Dijk Research & Training Manager SICON; Suriname Information & Communication Network Verl.Gemenelandsweg 163 Paramaribo, Suriname South America (+597) 464791 (+597) 491510 (fax) (+597)(0) 8579216 (gsm) gerold@sicon-sr.com gerold_vandijk@hotmail.com On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:38:23 -0300, Gerold van Dijk said: > Why can I NOT do a traceroute specifically within my own (sub)network > > 207.253.5.64/27 > > with any distribution of Linux?? OK.. I'll bite. What happens when you try? And why are you posting here - is there *any* evidence that there is a Linux kernel bug involved? The output of 'ifconfig' and 'netstat -r -n' would likely be helpful, as would proof that the host(s) you're tracerouting from and to are *not* running a firewall that interferes with the way traceroute functions. (It's amazing how many people block all ICMP, then wonder why traceroute doesn't work... ;) Watching the wire with 'tcpdump' and/or 'ethereal' can also help....