From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754892Ab0IBGiR (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:38:17 -0400 Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:31736 "EHLO sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352Ab0IBGiQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:38:16 -0400 Message-ID: <002201cb4a69$6ba15db0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> From: "Masayuki Ohtake" To: "Greg KH" Cc: "Greg KH" , , "LKML" , , , , , , , "Tomoya MORINAGA" References: <4C7E441E.4090006@dsn.okisemi.com> <20100902010236.GA21782@kroah.com> <000601cb4a47$b1a7d1d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> <20100902032227.GA27463@suse.de> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_PHUB driver to 2.6.35 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:38:11 +0900 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 X-Hosting-Pf: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, > Nope, I still get a warning with this patch, but I'll go fix it up: To see your indicated warning information, I have tried to build the following(latest) version with our phub patch. - linux-2.6.35.4 - linux-2.6.35.y But we can't see the warning(No warning No error). How can we see the warning ? Thanks, Ohtake(OKISemi) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg KH" To: "Masayuki Ohtake" Cc: "Greg KH" ; ; "LKML" ; ; ; ; ; ; ; "Tomoya MORINAGA" Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_PHUB driver to 2.6.35 > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:36:45AM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > Nope, I still get a warning with this patch, but I'll go fix it up: > > Sorry for our warning. > > We tested with kernel-2.6.35.3. > > We will modify so that warning becomes to disappear soon. > > I already fixed this up now. The issue was that you were not using %p > to print out a pointer and you were trying to use an int instead of a > ssize_t for the pci rom stuff. All of that shows up when building on > x86-64. > > I've commited the fix to my tree, you should have been copied on it > already. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >