All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: 'John Harrison' <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	'Tomas Elf' <tomas.elf@intel.com>,
	'Daniel Vetter' <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	'Jani Nikula' <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: As of kernel 4.3-rc1 system will not stay in S3 suspend [REGRESSION][BISECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 23:43:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002301d1025d$d5765090$8062f1b0$@net> (raw)


Hi,

This started somewhere between Kernel 4.2 and 4.3-rc1,
but I only noticed it a day ago.

The first S3 suspend after a fresh boot works fine.
Thereafter, suspends simply resume again immediately.

I get the following errors on my console:

[  152.697247] i915 0000:00:02.0: GEM idle failed, resume might fail
[  152.697258] pci_pm_suspend(): i915_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50 [i915] returns -11
[  152.697262] dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x140 returns -11
[  152.697264] PM: Device 0000:00:02.0 failed to suspend async: error -11
[  152.697306] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected

The issue is not limited to my normal way of doing suspend, using "pm-suspend".
It also happens using the "echo mem > /sys/power/state" method.

The kernel was bisected, and the result was double checked by clean compiles
of the first bad commit and the immediately preceding commit. Bisect results
copied below:

$ git bisect good
dc4be6071a24f0d2da6af8ce16c19f276ac4d7a2 is the first bad commit
commit dc4be6071a24f0d2da6af8ce16c19f276ac4d7a2
Author: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Date:   Fri May 29 17:43:39 2015 +0100

    drm/i915: Add explicit request management to i915_gem_init_hw()

    Now that a single per ring loop is being done for all the different
    intialisation steps in i915_gem_init_hw(), it is possible to add proper request
    management as well. The last remaining issue is that the context enable call
    eventually ends up within *_render_state_init() and this does its own private
    _i915_add_request() call.

    This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the top level loop
    and removes the add_request() from deep within the sub-functions.

    v2: Updated for removal of batch_obj from add_request call in previous patch.

    For: VIZ-5115
    Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

:040000 040000 789c630ff3f5f07238a5df1bde79187c6c1251d0 2da3f7e20e2642d8eebd9f72528923c2ac53a8cb M      drivers



_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09  6:43 Doug Smythies [this message]
2015-10-09  7:23 ` As of kernel 4.3-rc1 system will not stay in S3 suspend [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Daniel Vetter
2015-10-12 14:45 ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002301d1025d$d5765090$8062f1b0$@net' \
    --to=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomas.elf@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.