From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C29BC43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56800206E9 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="s7ARfL4I" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56800206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jKOsJ-0007HQ-GM; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:08:55 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jKOsI-0007HL-E0 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:08:54 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 69d09cca-75c5-11ea-83d8-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 69d09cca-75c5-11ea-83d8-bc764e2007e4; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id m17so9128806wrw.11 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:08:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=0y41U1ZJATzuc4am2cSQTNFJJtdkrB4HlZZXeNT5NSE=; b=s7ARfL4I1IXzgYPP59bpz8+8apUkk0r2vZT3+CF7nDTkXSIQizEAZV7V5Rq1ZiDXmg sxiQ0cNEYmhVcaXSzS56foZ/p5kuOmcvTQofiu5UHUJx8SxlTIBZUVl6nm9sxp7i2KBd qv+AtXUXJwZsIkuhLS58CRSIPiNxmIAIhJrWNJioCffHfmF094jXFcOYHtc7vCWGzSEh AZklz5trKB+RcocE79T68YG+7TVesQyQ6C+CSu/TpYka804wiOKFQIzPqrTDamk0GIOQ 11HsoKrrV8I/d5wjGGbC3NAEYJUtGXd4zjhxfxlEgxwihi3Xt4MIWW2S31brg8AtHLsB SnRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:thread-index; bh=0y41U1ZJATzuc4am2cSQTNFJJtdkrB4HlZZXeNT5NSE=; b=RVyRAHAz4Xrl5+t7g3dA+p9H6a8iveNDzMZ57txtwDi1NeIhPDJiL/PiLUuNNvuiyz e/RTAdkKjZdFs77QrWTIRRkNu083b9UD0rtKFAKfZdr7kCtzBT0AzxWjBmRu1PDHfVhY 7ivs0XnlaCFWG8s2UvamsHSDW5fXaRdRCDedOTK6/qmY2RS1NUB3cHxAGQxBgjKpsHQ5 lwsC1sE5AC0AtxS6W9RslO6bHV1J5hMZ9ipww5ZY37R61gkEkxgHW86PkKAlKyP7aBhX khCZrMCm7AIbcx31c0hfcxspOGYnl6Mb/tgica85Fr+R5UGjK9I4DR2+as242HN7u6gM hlWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZJwZvkaWOXT/UffuFxVu7Xin2AllhLPpIoTOR8t4K599c89QxO qAzkkXgX36a0GEItDZCNQqE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLUsRj/fOnC+mRYii/6OIpy2RsRbSx6wsMEBLAWiDXF3/8RQt2uuqs7a2oQg4hiE/ELRrWeZw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f08b:: with SMTP id n11mr7240484wro.323.1585930132865; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CBGR90WXYV0 ([54.239.6.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z203sm12131623wmg.12.2020.04.03.09.08.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Durrant X-Google-Original-From: "Paul Durrant" To: "'Jan Beulich'" References: <20200327185012.1795-1-paul@xen.org> <20200327185012.1795-4-paul@xen.org> <001e01d609cb$64913fa0$2db3bee0$@xen.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain context Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: <002301d609d2$2ae8a480$80b9ed80$@xen.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: en-gb Thread-Index: AQG3I8TZM/MLMEc/e2It3WEXPZVs8AIR6g5qAoK3rZoCJSYWbwIOuLj5qF8YKXA= X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: paul@xen.org Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, 'Ian Jackson' , 'Wei Liu' Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: 03 April 2020 16:30 > To: paul@xen.org > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; 'Ian Jackson' = ; 'Wei Liu' > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain = context >=20 > On 03.04.2020 17:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jan Beulich > >> Sent: 30 March 2020 11:54 > >> To: Paul Durrant > >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson = ; Wei Liu > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain = context > >> > >> On 27.03.2020 19:50, Paul Durrant wrote: > >>> This tools is analogous to 'xen-hvmctx' which presents HVM = context. > >>> Subsequent patches will add 'dump' functions when new records are > >>> introduced. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant > >>> --- > >>> Cc: Ian Jackson > >>> Cc: Wei Liu > >>> --- > >>> .gitignore | 1 + > >>> tools/misc/Makefile | 4 ++ > >>> tools/misc/xen-ctx.c | 144 = +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> Is xen-ctx a good choice of a name, considering we already have not > >> only xen-hvmctx, but also xenctx? If the new functionality isn't a > >> good fit for either, perhaps its name would better reflect its > >> connection to save/restore records? xen-sr-dump looks pretty clumsy > >> to me, but still seems better than a name easily mixed up with > >> others. > > > > How about xen-domctx? >=20 > Hmm, maybe. Seeing this is about PV pieces, xen-pvctx might also be > an option. Yes, that would work but it also implies it might only be valid for PV = domains. I also prefer 'domctx' since it better matches the name I chose = for the framework. Paul