From: "Barry A Rich" <barich@trisectrix.com>
To: casper@meteor.dp.ua
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: How to reset everything
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:55:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002701c9d7b7$e2310460$a6930d20$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241711493.5166.14.camel@casper.meteor.dp.ua>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of ??????????? ??????
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:52 AM
> To: barich@trisectrix.com
> Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: How to reset everything
>
> В Чтв, 07/05/2009 в 09:49 -0400, Barry A Rich пишет:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Покотиленко Костик [mailto:casper@meteor.dp.ua]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:04 AM
> > > To: barich@trisectrix.com
> > > Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: How to reset everything
> > >
> > > В Срд, 06/05/2009 в 18:03 -0400, Barry A Rich пишет:
> > > > We use Netfilter to load balance UDP packets across multiple uplinks
> > (ppp0,
> > > > ppp1, ppp2, ppp3). Uplinks can be added or removed on the fly. When
this
> > > > happens, we reset everything and run the firewall/routing script
that
> > > > matches the new uplink configuration. The reset looks like this:
> > > >
> > > > ######################### Begin reset #########################
> > > >
> > > > iptables -F INPUT
> > > > iptables -P INPUT DROP
> > > > iptables -F OUTPUT
> > > > iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> > > > iptables -F FORWARD
> > > > iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> > > > iptables -F -t raw
> > > > iptables -F -t nat
> > > > iptables -F -t mangle
> > > >
> > > > ip route del default
> > > > ip route flush table uplink1
> > > > ip route flush table uplink2
> > > > ip route flush table uplink3
> > > > ip route flush table uplink4
> > > > ip route flush dev ppp0
> > > > ip route flush dev ppp1
> > > > ip route flush dev ppp2
> > > > ip route flush dev ppp3
> > > >
> > > > tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root
> > > > tc qdisc del dev ppp1 root
> > > > tc qdisc del dev ppp2 root
> > > > tc qdisc del dev ppp3 root
> > > >
> > > > ip route flush cache
> > > >
> > > > ######################### End reset #########################
> > > >
> > > > For two uplinks, the setup looks like this:
> > > >
> > > > ######################### Begin setup #########################
> > > >
> > > > iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp --sport 6970 -j NOTRACK
> > > >
> > > > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --sport 6970 -m statistic
--mode
> > nth
> > > > --every 2 --packet 0 -j MARK --set-mark 1
> > > >
> > > > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --sport 6970 -m statistic
--mode
> > nth
> > > > --every 2 --packet 1 -j MARK --set-mark 2
> > > >
> > > > tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio
> > > >
> > > > tc qdisc add dev ppp1 root handle 1: prio
> > > >
> > > > tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 \
> > > > handle 1 fw flowid 1:1 action nat egress x.x.x.x/32 y.y.y.y
> > > >
> > > > tc filter add dev ppp1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 \
> > > > handle 2 fw flowid 1:1 action nat egress x.x.x.x/32 z.z.z.z
> > > >
> > > > ######################### End setup #########################
> > > >
> > > > The UDP stream continues to be received on the LAN interface during
the
> > > > reset/setup. The reset/setup works most of the time, but
occasionally
> > the
> > > > packets going out ppp0 do not get NAT'd after a reset/setup.
Repeating
> > the
> > > > setup/reset sequence a second time seems to make it work, but I'd
rather
> > > > understand what's wrong and fix it.
> > > >
> > > > All help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Try adding to your reset script:
> > >
> > > conntrack -F conntrack
> > > conntrack -F expect
> > >
> > > --
> > > Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
> >
> > That did not solve the problem. Could it be packets that get queued up
while
> > the reset is in progress?
>
> If this is the case the delay shouldn't be long. Also, if this is the
> case next packets should behave as you expected and you wouldn't be
> reseting second time.
>
> > Should the uplink queues get flushed? If so, how
> > is that done?
>
> tc qdics del && tc qdisc add(???)
>
> --
> Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
When this problem occurs after a reset/setup, the UDP packets are still
routed to the both ppp0 and ppp1. They just are not NAT'd on ppp0.
This seems to indicate:
- The statistic module is correctly marking the packets, and
- The packets are being routed correctly, and
- The traffic control filter is not NAT'ing the packets.
Is there a way to log the packets (with the marks) as they exit traffic
control to verify this?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-06 22:03 How to reset everything Barry A Rich
2009-05-07 10:04 ` Покотиленко Костик
2009-05-07 13:49 ` Barry A Rich
2009-05-07 15:51 ` Покотиленко Костик
2009-05-18 12:55 ` Barry A Rich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002701c9d7b7$e2310460$a6930d20$@com' \
--to=barich@trisectrix.com \
--cc=casper@meteor.dp.ua \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.