All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@elitecore.com>
To: 'Jan Engelhardt' <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: sequence of matches in a single rule
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:51:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002801c8b7ee$a72b2060$f5816120$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805170905070.15590@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>



-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jan Engelhardt
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:36 PM
To: Nishit Shah
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sequence of matches in a single rule


On Saturday 2008-05-17 07:40, Nishit Shah wrote:

>Hi,
>	Is there any specific order in which match will take place ?

Yes. For -m conntrack and -m mark however, it does not matter,
as no internal state is modified. It does matter however,
for example, with -m statistic --mode nth and -m quota.

So, can I have that order somewhere mentioned or I need to go through source
code ? If I write some of my own match do I have any way to change the match
preference ? 
	The reason I am asking is, there are some matches that are CPU
incentive and some are not. For an example I prefer -m mark to always take
precedence before -m limit or -m hashlimit, something like that..
	Or is it more preferable to not use such thing in single rule and
prefer 2 iptables rules for that ?

Rgds,
Nishit Shah. 




  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-17  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-17  5:40 sequence of matches in a single rule Nishit Shah
2008-05-17  7:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-17  7:21   ` Nishit Shah [this message]
2008-05-17  8:35     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-17  8:48       ` Nishit Shah
2008-05-17  9:12         ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002801c8b7ee$a72b2060$f5816120$@com' \
    --to=nishit@elitecore.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.