From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([72.48.136.20]:39085 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbaFENz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:55:26 -0400 From: "Steve Wise" To: "'Bart Van Assche'" , Cc: , , References: <20140602171433.31076.5634.stgit@build.ogc.int> <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:31 -0500 Message-ID: <002901cf80c5$d0b577e0$722067a0$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanassche@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM > To: Steve Wise; bfields@fieldses.org > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; tom@opengridcomputing.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests > > On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote: > > Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send > > work requests have been completed. > > Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ? > Yes. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steve Wise" Subject: RE: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:31 -0500 Message-ID: <002901cf80c5$d0b577e0$722067a0$@opengridcomputing.com> References: <20140602171433.31076.5634.stgit@build.ogc.int> <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53901ADB.9020405-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: 'Bart Van Assche' , bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM > To: Steve Wise; bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org > Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests > > On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote: > > Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send > > work requests have been completed. > > Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ? > Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html