All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fred -- Speed Up --" <speedup@free.fr>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Reiser4 bitmap & replication handling
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 20:33:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002d01c31efe$5da8b5d0$b300a8c0@xpstation> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1374 bytes --]

I just read this article about XFS :
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-fs9.html

It says XFS uses B+Trees as Reiser4 does, and it uses this structure to store not only the keys, but also the bitmap data and replicates it storage trees to improve scalability and overall wide-disk performance. It also tries to allocate the largest contigous blocks to a file (but Reiser4 does this also), and comes close to raw performance when reading large files. The article concludes XFS is faster than Reiser (3.6 I think, as the article has been published in 2002 by Gentoo CEO Daniel Robbins) with performance tweaks at mount time. But how does Reiser4 ?

How many times does Reiser replicate and/or truncate its tree, and what structure has been chosen for bitmap data ?
Does Reiser4 divide the disk space in chunks, as XFS and ext2 do ?
Are you implementing some special features for very large disks, RAID systems and multi-processing hardware ?
Is the developement far enough to get an idea of the final performance ? I didn't remember, when do you plan to release Reiser4 ?

I'm very interested in those brand new filesystem techniques, for now I think we can consider that XFS and Reiser3 are very close in overall performance. You're saying in the doc you'd like to keep on offering the best performance in the market : are you really that far ?

Fred

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-20 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-20 18:33 Fred -- Speed Up -- [this message]
2003-05-20 19:54 ` Reiser4 bitmap & replication handling Hans Reiser
     [not found]   ` <001701c31fb4$69e14090$b300a8c0@xpstation>
     [not found]     ` <3ECBE935.3000401@namesys.com>
2003-05-22 17:17       ` Fred -- Speed Up --
2003-05-23  7:33         ` Oleg Drokin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-22 16:14 Fred -- Speed Up --

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002d01c31efe$5da8b5d0$b300a8c0@xpstation' \
    --to=speedup@free.fr \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.