From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Laila Winblad Berntsen" Subject: Re: SNAT firewall maybe compromised. Misconfiguration? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:08:01 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <003001c30e71$e4213260$010a0a0a@suburban> References: <004301c30e61$541d5190$1800a8c0@medusa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thiago Lima , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org This is only telling whats the policy of the chain, setting it to DROP will drop all packets that dont match a rule in the chain. A good idea would be to put them first. Regards John Berntsen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thiago Lima " To: ; Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 5:09 PM Subject: RE: SNAT firewall maybe compromised. Misconfiguration? > > No, I did not. > > The script was cut off, but only in some portforwarding rules, just more > 5 redirects. > > Should I use this -P INPUT DROP -P FORWARD DROP in both interfaces? In > the end of my script? > > thanks > thiago. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alistair Tonner [mailto:Alistair@nerdnet.ca] > S > > You aren't showing us your policies, and that leads me to > believe > that the chain policies might be ACCEPT ... which is very not > good. > Also it ranter looks like this script was cut off.... so I can't > be sure... > > $IPTABLES -P INPUT DROP > $IPTABLES -P FORWARD DROP > > ?? do you do this at all?? > -- > > Alistair Tonner > nerdnet.ca > Senior Systems Analyst - RSS > > Any sufficiently advanced technology will have the appearance of > magic. > Lets get magical! > >