From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: fix possible bogus dereference under heavy load
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 07:40:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003801d441f0$fdc37a70$f94a6f50$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180901074414.GA32538@lst.de>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2018 2:44 AM
> To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
> Cc: linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org; Steve Wise
> <swise at opengridcomputing.com>; Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: fix possible bogus dereference under
> heavy load
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018@06:14:47PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > Currently we always repost the recv buffer before we send a response
> > capsule back to the host. Since ordering is not guaranteed for send
> > and recv completions, it is posible that we will receive a new request
> > from the host before we got a send completion for the response capsule.
> >
> > Today, we pre-allocate 2x rsps the length of the queue, but in reality,
under
> > heavy load there is nothing that is really preventing the gap to expand
> > until we exhaust all our rsps.
>
> This is a little scary and means we have the same issue in all other
> protocol drivers. It also means that there probably is no point in
> allocating twice the queue length as it will be wasted most of the
> time, but still not enough.
I'm not sure the other protocols have this issue. Where is the similar
issue in ib_isert?
If we made the rsp struct part of the nvmet_rdma_cmd, then we could remove
this issue and the list management involved with the nvmet_rdma_rsp struct.
Then we're ensured that when we get a nvme command from the host via a
recv_done completion, we have a rsp.
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-01 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-01 1:14 [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: fix possible bogus dereference under heavy load Sagi Grimberg
2018-09-01 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-01 12:40 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2018-09-02 16:24 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-09-03 10:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-09-03 10:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-09-03 14:54 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-09-03 10:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003801d441f0$fdc37a70$f94a6f50$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.