Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error.

["Chung Ming" <min@hello.org>]

Hi David, now I can't get any reply from this DoC millenium, no "DiskOnChip
found at address.." anymore just "possible DoC with unknow chipID found at
....." .

I wonder if DoC got damaged or they just keep using different flash? I will
buy a new one and test again.

Regards.

Ming.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Woodhouse
To: Chung Ming
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error.


On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Chung Ming wrote:

> "DiskOnChip found at address 0xEE000"
> No Flash Chips Recognized.

Try this and tell me what it says...

Index: doc2001.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/mtd/drivers/mtd/devices/doc2001.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.35 doc2001.c
--- doc2001.c 2001/10/02 15:05:13 1.35
+++ doc2001.c 2002/02/11 14:02:35
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@
  }
  }

- if (nand_flash_ids[i].name == NULL)
+ if (nand_flash_ids[i].name == NULL) {
+ printk("Chip with mfr %02x, id %02x unknown. Tell dwmw2\n");
  return 0;
+ }
  else
  return 1;
 }



--
dwmw2


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/