All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Walt Wyndroski" <wdwrn@friendlycity.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Simply IMQ
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:48:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003a01c4635f$f4cc9e30$0201a8c0@jabbacom.net> (raw)

I've followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a couple
of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was his
name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in my
test environment. I now need to implement it in my production environment.
My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection to
the internet. It is quite busy much of the time. It runs Fedora Core 1 now
but will most likely be upgraded to Fedora Core 2 in the next month or so.

Now with all that said, here is my question. I see that maintenance of IMQ
has been passed on a couple of times. I see some people say that IMQ is not
stable and should not be put into a production environment. My use of IMQ a
year ago invovled only egress qdiscs using HTB and SFQ because the egress
qdiscs were much more powerful and better than the ingress qdisc. The only
problem that I ever had with IMQ was using the iptables target with both
PREROUTING and POSTROUTING. I see Roy has posted that IMQ essentially
crashes when doing egress shaping. Is this correct? I've always understood
egress as outbound shaping/filtering and ingress as inbound
shaping/filtering. I say that because I saw in an earlier post by Roy that
he changed his terminology to INPUT,OUTPUT, and FORWARD. Was he not using
the terms egress and ingress correctly? I see that the current 'big' problem
is touching locally generated traffic. What I need to know is which version
of IMQ is most stable for kernel 2.6? Or even kernel2.4? Is it Devera's?
McHardy's? Correa's? or Roy's? Or should I just leave it alone? My apologies
if I got names wrong.

This is probably a long email just to ask that question, but I can't seem to
find an answer from the list archives. I downloaded the whole 46 mb archive
and essentially read 90% of the posts related to IMQ. I'm just trying to get
a good understanding of what's happening with/to IMQ.

Thank you in advance for any advice.

Walt Wyndroski

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2004-07-06 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-06 13:48 Walt Wyndroski [this message]
2004-07-06 14:34 ` [LARTC] Simply IMQ Roy
2004-07-06 17:37 ` Walt Wyndroski
2004-07-06 18:07 ` Andre Correa
2004-07-06 18:23 ` Andre Correa
2004-07-06 19:31 ` Walt Wyndroski
2004-07-06 19:43 ` Andre Correa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003a01c4635f$f4cc9e30$0201a8c0@jabbacom.net' \
    --to=wdwrn@friendlycity.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.