From: "Navin Boppuri" <nboppuri@trinetcommunication.com>
To: "Leonard Ye" <leonardye@xoommail.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough?
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:33:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003d01bfc6ee$995bce70$4a1f76d8@washington> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200101260218.SAA28758@xoommail.com
Hello Leonard,
I have used the FADS 823 for my needs. I did not have any major problems
with it. But the pro's tell me that it is not a reliable board.
I have also used the TQM823 board from Denx. It is a reliable board and the
support is good. My reason for getting the TQM823 board was that I could use
2 RS-232's. The FADS 823 has a 2nd RS-232 which may be used only if the
ethernet is turned off.
Hope this helps.
Navin Boppuri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leonard Ye" <leonardye@xoommail.com>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:18 AM
Subject: is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough?
> A newbie question. Currently, I am considering using FADS 823/850/860
> board for embedded system development. While I was reading the "Linux for
> PowerPC Embedded Systems HOWTO" as every newbie did initially, I was
> referred to the message written by Dan Malek on 03 Sep 1999 in this
> maillist. His oppinion on FADS 8xx is that "I don't recommend using any
> (F)ADS board with Linux/PPC." The full message can be viewed at:
> http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-embedded/199909/msg00007.html
>
> It has been more than one year since this message was written. I would like
> to know has this situation been changed? I need good PCMCIA, ethernet and
> UART support, USB support is need in the second stage of development. Any
> comments from you guys?
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-26 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-26 2:18 is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough? Leonard Ye
2001-01-26 7:21 ` Remote multi-thread debugging is valid? Kwanksuk Kim
2001-01-26 15:33 ` Navin Boppuri [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003d01bfc6ee$995bce70$4a1f76d8@washington' \
--to=nboppuri@trinetcommunication.com \
--cc=leonardye@xoommail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.