From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com>
To: "'Alan Cox'" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
"'James Clark'" <jimwclark@ntlworld.com>,
"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Driver Model
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:13:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003d01c3722d$ffe1d1b0$294b82ce@stuartm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062601073.19058.70.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> You could equally ask the same question about any other measure - its
> no different to "I could shoot the shopkeeper and not pay", its an
> incentive to behave, a way for developers to make it clear their code
That's what I figured, I just wanted to check.
> isnt for stealing and without denying people the choice of what they
> run. The reputable vendors on the whole not only seem to obey it but
> actually put informative MODULE_LICENSE() tags into their code for
> their proprietary licenses.
Any examples off the top of your head? I'm curious.
..Stu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-03 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-02 18:43 Driver Model James Clark
2003-09-02 19:13 ` Robert Love
2003-09-02 20:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-03 14:36 ` Stuart MacDonald
2003-09-03 14:52 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-03 14:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Stuart MacDonald [this message]
2003-09-03 15:33 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2003-09-03 15:50 ` Stuart MacDonald
2003-09-03 16:02 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2003-09-03 17:58 ` Stuart MacDonald
2003-09-03 16:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 18:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-03 15:50 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2003-09-03 22:41 ` David Schwartz
2003-09-04 11:03 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 15:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-02 21:29 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 21:44 ` James Clark
2003-09-02 22:05 ` Greg KH
2003-09-02 22:08 ` Robert Love
2003-09-02 22:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-02 23:52 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 0:20 ` David Schwartz
2003-09-03 17:38 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 18:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 18:15 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-04 12:40 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-09-03 13:10 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <rtHg.3n0.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <rK5y.1xN.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-03 18:42 ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-09-03 19:49 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 22:41 ` David Schwartz
2003-09-03 23:11 ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-09-03 23:33 ` David Schwartz
2003-09-04 1:38 ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-09-04 3:01 ` David Schwartz
2003-09-04 14:21 ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-09-04 1:37 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003d01c3722d$ffe1d1b0$294b82ce@stuartm' \
--to=stuartm@connecttech.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jimwclark@ntlworld.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.