From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
To: "'Arthur Kepner'" <akepner@sgi.com>
Cc: <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, <bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"'Leonid. Grossman \(E-mail\)'" <leonid.grossman@neterion.com>,
"'Raghavendra. Koushik \(E-mail\)'"
<raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com>
Subject: RE: High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ?
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:49:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004101c53979$45f02800$3a10100a@pc.s2io.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503291027240.23261@linux.site>
Arthur,
On what kernel version should your below mentioned patch be applied ?
We tried on one of the older kernels(2.6.5) and got an Oops while
loading the bonding driver.
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Kepner [mailto:akepner@sgi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:29 AM
To: Ravinandan Arakali
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com; bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Leonid.
Grossman (E-mail); Raghavendra. Koushik (E-mail)
Subject: Re: High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ?
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> ....
> Results(8 nttcp/chariot streams):
> ---------------------------------
> 1. Combined throughputs(but no bonding):
> 3.1 + 6.2 = 9.3 Gbps with 58% CPU idle.
>
> 2. eth0 and eth1 bonded together in LACP mode:
> 8.2 Gbps with 1% CPU idle.
>
> From the above results, when Bonding driver is used(#2), the CPUs are
> completely maxed out compared to the case when traffic is run
> simultaneously on both the cards(#1).
> Can anybody suggest some reasons for the above behavior ?
>
Ravi;
Have you tried this patch?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=111091146828779&w=2
If not, it will likely go a long way to solving your
problem.
--
Arthur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 18:22 High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ? Ravinandan Arakali
2005-03-29 18:29 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-03-29 19:13 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05 0:49 ` Ravinandan Arakali [this message]
2005-04-05 3:03 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-05 19:04 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05 20:31 ` Jay Vosburgh
2005-04-05 21:40 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-13 21:29 ` Ravinandan Arakali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004101c53979$45f02800$3a10100a@pc.s2io.com' \
--to=ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com \
--cc=akepner@sgi.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=leonid.grossman@neterion.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.