From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 2nd 2/4] Samsung DT 3rd updates for v4.3 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:11:04 +0900 Message-ID: <005101d0d5b0$5d4333b0$17c99b10$@kernel.org> References: <55CBE0F2.4020104@kernel.org> <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:53573 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751821AbbHMKLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 06:11:13 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr1.samsung.com (u141.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.141]) by mailout4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NT002HJFMYH6P40@mailout4.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:11:05 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Olof Johansson' , 'Kukjin Kim' Cc: arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , 'Kevin Hilman' , 'Mike Turquette' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' , 'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' , 'Michael Turquette' Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:12:34AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, Kevin > > > > This is based on tags/samsung-dt-2 and including exynos4 related clock > > changes to support cpufreq-dt driver for exynos4 SoCs. Note that I've > > created one more clk topic branch called v4.3-topic/clk-samsung-2 based > > on previous one has been merged by Mike into clock tree before but I'm > > not sure new one merged into clk tree that's why I've noted its merge in > > this signed tag. > > Since this depends on the previous DT branch that I asked for a respin, please > do it all over and send a fresh pull request that we hopefully can include. > Yes, will make a fresh pull request for the exynos cpufreq-dt driver. > We normally ask that you don't queue up merge requests like these for that > reason: If there's need to redo an earlier branch there's a lot of work that > needs to be done on your side. Instead, please wait until previous pull request > has been merged before you send the next one. Thanks! > Yeah, you're right. Actually, it was hard to handle it because of dependencies of clk and cpufreq...Anyway I'll keep in mind what you suggested. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:11:04 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 2nd 2/4] Samsung DT 3rd updates for v4.3 In-Reply-To: <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost> References: <55CBE0F2.4020104@kernel.org> <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost> Message-ID: <005101d0d5b0$5d4333b0$17c99b10$@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:12:34AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, Kevin > > > > This is based on tags/samsung-dt-2 and including exynos4 related clock > > changes to support cpufreq-dt driver for exynos4 SoCs. Note that I've > > created one more clk topic branch called v4.3-topic/clk-samsung-2 based > > on previous one has been merged by Mike into clock tree before but I'm > > not sure new one merged into clk tree that's why I've noted its merge in > > this signed tag. > > Since this depends on the previous DT branch that I asked for a respin, please > do it all over and send a fresh pull request that we hopefully can include. > Yes, will make a fresh pull request for the exynos cpufreq-dt driver. > We normally ask that you don't queue up merge requests like these for that > reason: If there's need to redo an earlier branch there's a lot of work that > needs to be done on your side. Instead, please wait until previous pull request > has been merged before you send the next one. Thanks! > Yeah, you're right. Actually, it was hard to handle it because of dependencies of clk and cpufreq...Anyway I'll keep in mind what you suggested. Thanks, Kukjin