Re: Established / related

["Peter Marshall" <peter.marshall@caris.com>]

shouldn't the reply be taken care of by the established,related rule below ?

(I am probably just missing something blatantly obvious)

Peter

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: "netfilter" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Established / related


On Tuesday 29 June 2004 7:33 pm, Peter Marshall wrote:

> I was wondering if there is a way to use established, related on a
subchain
> only.
>
> ex.  ftp server behind firewall
>
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -d $IPSERVER -j ftpchain
>
> $IPTABLES -A ftpchain -p TCP -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
>
> This does not seem to work .. It only seems to work when I have the
> established,related line on the Forwared chain.

I really cannot see why this should not do what you want (which presumably
is
to match only established or related packets going to $IPSERVER).

The only thing which looks a little odd to me, which I wonder whether you've
forgotten, is to make sure there is a rule for the reply packets coming back
again from $IPSERVER?

If that's not the problem, please give some more details on how you're
testing
it and why you think it doesn't work.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
"It would appear we have reached the limits of what it is possible to
achieve
with computer technology, although one should be careful with such
statements; they tend to sound pretty silly in five years."

 - John von Neumann (1949)

                                                     Please reply to the
list;
                                                           please don't CC
me.