From: Rameshkumar Sundaram <rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>, jjohnson@kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: fix warning when unbinding
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 23:49:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005af843-da19-4df9-af67-2cd148b24d62@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420110130.509670-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>
On 4/20/2026 4:31 PM, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> If there is an error during some initialization related to firmware,
> the buffers dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status are released.
> However this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath11k_pci),
> and we get:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6231 at mm/slub.c:4368 free_large_kmalloc+0x57/0x90
> Call Trace:
> free_large_kmalloc
> ath11k_dp_free
> ath11k_core_deinit
> ath11k_pci_remove
> ...
>
> The issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing
> initialization is failing.
>
> In order to fix the issue, just set the buffers to NULL after releasing in
> order to avoid the double free.
>
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp.c
> index bbb86f165141..5a50b623bd07 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp.c
> @@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ void ath11k_dp_free(struct ath11k_base *ab)
> idr_destroy(&dp->tx_ring[i].txbuf_idr);
> spin_unlock_bh(&dp->tx_ring[i].tx_idr_lock);
> kfree(dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status);
> + dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status = NULL;
> }
>
> /* Deinit any SOC level resource */
On which hardware did you observe this issue? is it QCA6390, WCN6855,
QCA2066 or QCA6698AQ ? Also, where do you see the initial failure ? Is
it somewhere in ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready() ?
I am asking because this looks like it may be exposed by commit
6fe62a8cec51 ("wifi: ath11k: Add cold boot calibration support on
WCN6750") [1]. That commit added the ATH11K_QMI_EVENT_FW_READY path, but
the return value from ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready() is not handled
there. If that call fails after ath11k_dp_free() has already run on the
error path, ATH11K_FLAG_QMI_FAIL is not set. Later, ath11k_pci_remove()
does not take the QMI-fail cleanup path and calls ath11k_core_deinit(),
which calls ath11k_dp_free() and other cleanup functions again.
This is similar to the failure case fixed earlier by a19c0e104db9
("ath11k: Handle failure in qmi firmware ready") [2], where failure from
ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready() needed to be handled.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220720134909.15626-3-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1645079195-13564-1-git-send-email-quic_seevalam@quicinc.com
--
Ramesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 11:01 [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: fix warning when unbinding Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-04-28 2:28 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-04-29 5:14 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-04-29 7:23 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-05-06 18:19 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram [this message]
2026-05-07 7:08 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-05-08 10:17 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram
2026-05-08 10:31 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-05-14 4:54 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram
2026-05-14 6:18 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-05-14 6:55 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram
2026-05-14 8:15 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-05-15 2:27 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram
2026-05-15 6:39 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-05-14 6:56 ` Rameshkumar Sundaram
2026-05-15 6:40 ` Baochen Qiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=005af843-da19-4df9-af67-2cd148b24d62@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.