From: "freaky" <freaky@bananateam.nl>
To: <korn-linuxkernel@chardonnay.math.bme.hu>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 very slow memory access on abit kd7raid (kt400); ten times slower than on kg7raid
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006001c27d8b$f0a75720$1400a8c0@Freaky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021027032811.GM27554@nilus-2690.adsl.datanet.hu
l> Everything slowed down. The easiest way to demontsrate this is by looking
at
> these figures:
>
> raid5: measuring checksumming speed
> - 8regs : 2343.600 MB/sec
> - 32regs : 1944.000 MB/sec
> - pIII_sse : 4163.600 MB/sec
> - pII_mmx : 3584.400 MB/sec
> - p5_mmx : 4600.800 MB/sec
> -raid5: using function: pIII_sse (4163.600 MB/sec)
> + 8regs : 228.400 MB/sec
> + 32regs : 199.200 MB/sec
> + pIII_sse : 352.000 MB/sec
> + pII_mmx : 316.800 MB/sec
> + p5_mmx : 432.800 MB/sec
> +raid5: using function: pIII_sse (352.000 MB/sec)
>
> Old motherboard above, new below. (Why it chose pIII_sse even when p5_mmx
> was faster is also an interesting question... :)
I have seen the same on a precompiled slackware 8.1 raid.s kernel I tried
for my promise controller. It's an AMD AthlonXP 2000+. Like you I found that
the PIII_SSE was slower than the P5_MMX and still got selected. I got higher
numers than you though, around your old mobo's speeds.... (KT333 chipset).
(MSI KT3 Ultra2-R). specs are in the KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttak, Initrd
topic.
the 5 disks spanning ram image doesn't even load properly with me, maybe
it's caused by memory problems as well? Tho' I thought north bridges are for
memory access whilst I only get a message that my southbridge isn't
recognized...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-27 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-27 3:28 2.4 very slow memory access on abit kd7raid (kt400); ten times slower than on kg7raid KORN Andras
2002-10-27 7:39 ` freaky [this message]
[not found] ` <20021027075346.GB29184@alpha.home.local>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210270139530.22820-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-10-27 13:33 ` KORN Andras
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210271245430.3202-100000@pianoman.cluster.toy>
2002-10-27 18:19 ` [solved] " KORN Andras
2002-10-28 1:42 ` John Clemens
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-27 9:16 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006001c27d8b$f0a75720$1400a8c0@Freaky' \
--to=freaky@bananateam.nl \
--cc=korn-linuxkernel@chardonnay.math.bme.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.