From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Reese Faucette" <reese@myri.com>
Subject: Re: vif interface dropping 80% packets
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:52:53 -0800
Message-ID: <006501c74af9$f0462730$58c31fac@bart>
References: <086c01c74986$0e8fd120$58c31fac@bart><08CA2245AFCF444DB3AC415E47CC40AF71781F@G3W0072.americas.hpqcorp.net><007101c74a20$cf49d600$58c31fac@bart><08CA2245AFCF444DB3AC415E47CC40AF71789E@G3W0072.americas.hpqcorp.net><00b901c74a41$86ba3b70$58c31fac@bart><8A87A9A84C201449A0C56B728ACF491E04F46E@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	<00cd01c74a47$7d915b40$58c31fac@bart>
	<8A87A9A84C201449A0C56B728ACF491E04F470@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Indeed, xen-unstable is MUCH better - TCP_SENDFILE looks more like 6.5Gb/s 
on my first try from native to domU with no fiddling.
The fact that xen-unstable is based on 2.6.18 is a big help, also.

Ian, is this more in line with what you have seen before?

thanks for the pointers,
-reese.