From: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
To: "'Jeff King'" <peff@peff.net>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] Git 2.43.0-rc0 - t4216 unpack(Q) invalid type
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:01:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007c01da0e6f$014e2c30$03ea8490$@nexbridge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231103155220.GA1470570@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:50:19AM -0400, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>> In RC0, the following tests are failing (with verbose). They look like
>> the same root cause. Unpack("Q>".... What version does git now require for perl?
>> I have v5.30.3 available, nothing more recent.
>
>The perl used in the test suite is supposed to be vanilla enough to support any
>ancient version. The perl5 Git import doesn't have version tags that go back that far,
>but the quadwords in pack/unpack go back at least to a commit from 1998.
>
>So I suspect this is not a version issue, but rather a build-time config one. The docs
>say:
>
> Q An unsigned quad value.
> (Quads are available only if your system supports 64-bit integer
> values _and_ if Perl has been compiled to support those. Raises
> an exception otherwise.)
>
>It would probably be possible to rewrite the use of "Q" here to grab two 32-bit
>values instead. But I'd guess that on your system it is not as simple as a shift-and-
>add to then treat them as a 64-bit value, since presumably the problem is that perl's
>ints are all strictly 32-bit.
>
>What does this script produce for you:
>
> perl -e '
> my $bytes = "\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8";
> my $q = eval { unpack("Q>", $bytes) };
> print "Q = ", defined($q) ? $q : "($@)", "\n";
> my ($n1, $n2) = unpack("NN", $bytes);
> print "n1 = $n1\n";
> print "n2 = $n2\n";
> print "computed quad = ", ($n1 << 32) | $n2, "\n";
> '
>
>I get:
>
> Q = 72623859790382904
> n1 = 16909060
> n2 = 84281144
> computed quad = 72623859790382904
>
>but I'm guessing you get an exception report for Q, and that the computed quad is
>probably equal to n2 (the shift of n1 goes totally off the end).
>
>We may not be without hope, though. These 64-bit values are file offsets we're
>reading from the chunk files. The format naturally uses 64-bit values here to
>accommodate arbitrarily large files. But in our tests, the offsets are all going to be
>relatively small. So our "$n1" in practice will always be 0.
>
>> This same problem also happens in t5318, t5319, t5324
>
>Yep. The offending code is in lib-chunk.sh, so the new tests added in all of those
>scripts which use it will run into the same problem.
Explains a lot. We are only able to build git in 32-bit mode because of OS dependencies (only available in 32-bit). I did not know that 64-bit was now required for git. We will get there, but it will probably take years.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 14:50 [BUG] Git 2.43.0-rc0 - t4216 unpack(Q) invalid type rsbecker
2023-11-03 15:01 ` rsbecker
2023-11-03 15:52 ` Jeff King
2023-11-03 16:01 ` rsbecker [this message]
2023-11-03 16:20 ` [PATCH] t: avoid perl's pack/unpack "Q" specifier Jeff King
2023-11-04 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-04 4:59 ` Jeff King
2023-11-03 16:07 ` [BUG] Git 2.43.0-rc0 - t4216 unpack(Q) invalid type rsbecker
2023-11-03 16:21 ` Jeff King
2023-11-03 19:18 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007c01da0e6f$014e2c30$03ea8490$@nexbridge.com' \
--to=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.