Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?!

["Szabolcs Szasz" <sz@szasz.hu>]

Yep, sorry, I figured it RIGHT AFTER pressing that
damn Send button... :) Sorry again for spammin'...
(I just saw Hans, too, making a mistake on this
topic, so I can breathe a little easier now... ;-P )

Cheers,
Sab

----- Original Message -----
From: "Voicu Liviu" <liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il>
To: "Szabolcs Szasz" <sz@szasz.hu>; <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Sent: 2003. február 28. 13:56
Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 28 February 2003 14:23, Szabolcs Szasz wrote:
> Well, as man nice says:
>
>     "Range goes from -20 (highest priority) to 19 (lowest)."
>
> So why is that such a surprise that CPU goes up
> to the sky? Why else -20 is there for? (Or am I
> missing something?)

OK :-)
Here at home I have P2 300 Mhz ext3 based.
If I'll do nice -n -20 some_command_here this will not lock my box :-) really

>
> Cheers,
> Sab
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <m.c.p@gmx.net>
> To: "Voicu Liviu" <liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il>; "Hans Reiser"
> <reiser@namesys.com>; "Oleg Drokin" <green@namesys.com> Cc:
> <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
> Sent: 2003. február 28. 13:13
> Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?!
>
>
> On Friday 28 February 2003 13:11, Voicu Liviu wrote:
>
> Hi Voicu,
>
> > Already using this :-)
> > Any way, the system works great but if I change the "nice" value of some
> > process then the CPU almost becomes slave of this process.........
>
> out of sheer curiosity: Why you are nicing emerge to -20?!
>
> You are using the O(1) scheduler so I see absolute no need to do so.
>
> ciao, Marc

- --
Voicu Liviu

Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Rothberg International School
Assistant Programmer & Network Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+X1yDczD4Ii52ssMRAqxHAJ4q/QcrCv7v+aZw3K1zirpPid/weQCfck7F
LuF68EtGmeIqu+oaPJ61NYc=
=IKJZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----