From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Peter Olsson" Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with kernel 2.4.25 and iptables 1.2.9 in __unexpect_related Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:11:25 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <008901c45314$efb3dd10$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> References: <002401c452ac$06523580$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> <40CEB3DA.5070401@trash.net> <004d01c45300$768a0a40$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> <40CF3A95.7060302@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Return-path: To: "Patrick McHardy" Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org I looked through all applied patches from pom, and it's the list below. The kernel I'm using now is 2.4.25, and that's the one I was using when it crashed, I applied these patches sometime in february and it was from pom-20031219. I guess some of these patches actually were applied in the 2.4.25 kernel source. submitted/61-remove-memsets submitted/64_masquerade-sameip-noflush submitted/69_amanda-helpers submitted/70_expect-evict-order submitted/72_recent_procfs_fix submitted/74_listhelp submitted/75_selective_cleanup submitted/76_conntrack_bucket_sysctl submitted/88_ip_queue-maxlen submitted/90_fw_compat_local-nullbinding pending/40_nf-log pending/40_nf-log-ipv6 pending/59_ip_nat_h-unused-var pending/60_ecn_raw_unclone base/HL-ipv6 base/iprange base/mport base/NETLINK base/REJECT-ipv6 base/SAME base/time base/TTL extra/CLASSIFY extra/CONNMARK extra/cuseeme-nat extra/IPMARK extra/mms-conntrack-nat extra/netfilter-docbook extra/pptp-conntrack-nat extra/rpc extra/rsh extra/string Regards, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick McHardy" To: "Peter Olsson" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with kernel 2.4.25 and iptables 1.2.9 in __unexpect_related > Peter Olsson wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > I meant kernel 2.4.17, not 2.4.27 :) > > > > About other patches... I've applied a couple of other patch-o-matic patches, > > but pptp_conntrack_nat > > is the only one that seem to call anything related to the __unexpect_related > > function. I've only applied > > patches that were tested ok, not the experimental ones. The > > "__unexpect_related" has the following > > code in my version of ip_conntrack_core.c. > > Well, there is at least one that won't work with pptp_conntrack_nat > (expect-optimize), so it would really help to see a list. When did > you patch your kernel with pom (roughly) ? You also didn't mention > which kernel version you ran when it crashed. > > Regards > Patrick > > > >