From: djani22@dynamicweb.hu
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Found a new bug!
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <009001c58ac8$9ab25d40$0400a8c0@LocalHost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E1Du4Uu-0006O7-84@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au
Hi all!
I think I found a new bug in the kernel ! (or mdadm?)
First I try this:
mkraid --configfile /etc/raidtab.nw /dev/md0 -R
DESTROYING the contents of /dev/md0 in 5 seconds, Ctrl-C if unsure!
handling MD device /dev/md0
analyzing super-block
couldn't get device size for /dev/md31 -- File too large
mkraid: aborted.
(In addition to the above messages, see the syslog and /proc/mdstat as well
for potential clues.)
Next I try this:
./create_linear
mdadm: /dev/md31 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=0 devices=1 ctime=Sun Jul 17 13:30:27 2005
Continue creating array? y
./create_linear: line 1: 2853 Segmentation fault mdadm --create
/dev/md0 --chunk=32 --level=linear --force --raid-devices=1 /dev/md31
After this little script the half of the raid subsystem hangs:
The raidtools makes nothing, the mdadm makes nothing too.
AND the cat /proc/mdstat is hangs too!
But the /dev/md31 device is still working.
mdstat in previous 2s: (watch cat /proc/mdstat)
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [faulty]
md31 : active raid0 md4[3] md3[2] md2[1] md1[0]
7814332928 blocks 32k chunks
md4 : active raid1 nbd3[0]
1953583296 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md3 : active raid1 nbd2[0]
1953583296 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md2 : active raid1 nbd1[0]
1953583296 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md1 : active raid1 nbd0[0]
1953583296 blocks [2/1] [U_]
unused devices: <none>
Kernel: 2.6.13-rc3
raidtools-1.00.3
mdadm-1.12.0
The background:
I try to build a big array ~8TB.
I use for this 5 PCs.
4 for "disk nodes" with nbd and 1 for "concentrator".
(from previous idea in this list. ;)
In the concentrator, the first level raid (md1-4) is for ability to backup,
swap the disk nodes. (node-spare)
The next level (md31) is for the performance. ;)
And, the last level (md0 linear) for scalability.
Why dont use LVM for last level?
Well, I try that, but cat /dev/.../LV >/dev/null can do only 15 - 16 MB/s
and cat /dev/md31 >/dev/null can do 34-38MB/s.
(the network is G-Ethernet, but only 32bit/33MHz PCI!)
Thanks
Janos
----- Original Message -----
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: [PATCH md ] When resizing an array, we need to update
resync_max_sectors as well as size.
> Another md patch against 2.6.13-rc2-mm2, suitable for 2.6.13.
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
> ### Comments for Changeset
>
> Without this, and attempt to 'grow' an array will claim to have synced
> the extra part without actually having done anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./drivers/md/raid1.c | 1 +
> ./drivers/md/raid5.c | 1 +
> ./drivers/md/raid6main.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff ./drivers/md/raid1.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid1.c
> --- ./drivers/md/raid1.c~current~ 2005-07-17 18:25:47.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./drivers/md/raid1.c 2005-07-17 17:18:13.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1467,6 +1467,7 @@ static int raid1_resize(mddev_t *mddev,
> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> }
> mddev->size = mddev->array_size;
> + mddev->resync_max_sectors = sectors;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> diff ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid5.c
> --- ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ 2005-07-17 18:25:47.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2005-07-17 18:25:52.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1931,6 +1931,7 @@ static int raid5_resize(mddev_t *mddev,
> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> }
> mddev->size = sectors /2;
> + mddev->resync_max_sectors = sectors;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> diff ./drivers/md/raid6main.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid6main.c
> --- ./drivers/md/raid6main.c~current~ 2005-07-17 18:25:47.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./drivers/md/raid6main.c 2005-07-17 17:19:04.000000000 +1000
> @@ -2095,6 +2095,7 @@ static int raid6_resize(mddev_t *mddev,
> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> }
> mddev->size = sectors /2;
> + mddev->resync_max_sectors = sectors;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-17 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050717182650.24540.patches@notabene>
2005-07-17 8:27 ` [PATCH md ] When resizing an array, we need to update resync_max_sectors as well as size NeilBrown
2005-07-17 12:10 ` djani22 [this message]
2005-07-17 22:13 ` Found a new bug! Neil Brown
2005-07-17 22:31 ` djani22
2005-08-14 22:38 ` djani22
2005-08-15 1:21 ` Neil Brown
2005-08-15 10:50 ` djani22
2005-08-16 13:54 ` perfomance question djani22
2005-08-16 14:30 ` RAID6 Query Colonel Hell
2005-08-16 15:40 ` dean gaudet
2005-08-16 16:44 ` Colonel Hell
2005-08-18 4:59 ` perfomance question Neil Brown
2005-08-18 15:20 ` djani22
2005-08-18 4:34 ` Found a new bug! Neil Brown
2005-08-18 15:39 ` djani22
2005-08-20 9:55 ` Oops in raid1? djani22
2005-08-20 15:53 ` Pallai Roland
2005-08-20 16:26 ` djani22
2005-08-20 16:50 ` Pallai Roland
2005-08-20 16:57 ` djani22
2005-07-17 22:20 Found a new bug! djani22
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='009001c58ac8$9ab25d40$0400a8c0@LocalHost' \
--to=djani22@dynamicweb.hu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.