From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yuzhong Sun" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogW1hlbi1kZXZlbF0gS2VybmVsIDIuND8=?= Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:11:34 +0800 Message-ID: <009001c67b56$842f8af0$9929e29f@IBMSYZH> References: <20060519135853.GA10674@snarc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0259018587==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060519135853.GA10674@snarc.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: 'Vincent Hanquez' Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0259018587== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0091_01C67B99.9252CAF0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C67B99.9252CAF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In fact, we are trying to build a virtual cluster on a set of VMs on top = of Xen. OpenMosix or Open SSI are available open-source cluster management tools. Do you know the better guys? =20 Thanks =20 -Yuzhong =20 -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Vincent Hanquez [mailto:tab@snarc.org]=20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2006=C4=EA5=D4=C219=C8=D5 21:59 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: Yuzhong Sun =B3=AD=CB=CD: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com =D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.4? =20 On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +0800, Yuzhong Sun wrote: > I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. However, the stable release of > openMosix is based on Linux Kernel 2.4(They are trying to port it to kernel > 2.6). =20 There's lots more work to port 2.4 kernels to Xen-3, than to finish 2.6 openmosix. Now you could just use Xen-2, which support 2.4 kernels. Patching 2.4 kernel on Xen2 with openmosix should be trivial. =20 > I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower kernel version such as 2.4 kernel. > There is some open sources based on kernel 2.4. =20 I wouldn't count openmosix-2.4 as a good source here ... =20 --=20 Vincent Hanquez =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C67B99.9252CAF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In fact, we are trying to build a virtual cluster on = a set of VMs on top of Xen. OpenMosix or Open SSI are available open-source = cluster management tools. Do you know the better = guys?

Thanks

-Yuzhong

-----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE-----
=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Vincent Hanquez [mailto:tab@snarc.org]
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2006=C4=EA5=D4=C219=C8=D5 21:59
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: Yuzhong Sun
=B3=AD=CB=CD: = xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
=D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel = 2.4?

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +0800, = Yuzhong Sun wrote:

> I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. = However, the stable release of

> openMosix is based on Linux Kernel = 2.4(They are trying to port it to kernel

> 2.6).

There's lots more work to port 2.4 kernels to = Xen-3, than to finish 2.6

openmosix. Now you could just use Xen-2, which = support 2.4 kernels.

Patching 2.4 kernel on Xen2 with openmosix = should be trivial.

> I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower = kernel version such as 2.4 kernel.

> There is some open sources based on = kernel 2.4.

I wouldn't count openmosix-2.4 as a good = source here ...

--

Vincent Hanquez

------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C67B99.9252CAF0-- --===============0259018587== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0259018587==--