From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DBAFFE008CA; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 08:05:22 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from ecbiz156.inmotionhosting.com (ecbiz156.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.201.8]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EE4E00830 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 08:05:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brioconcept.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From; bh=NwHGPF3lgDkVzhKPgRoHICORfj71xTi8T5iSmxHFB64=; b=A3U9v/1D7FTFrIpgG1akok9+9fL18nhwvszTJ93S36k0tDBEpsdrIugMsQtFOwrX8xqncqUxBRX2YCEgx2ncc2S4KnCzJqIn3be8w0gb15eHtbL/uzuinL+lulWksyqYqx8AP5o6WJe4vyAUeS80781Uuws1fayM14L7i5xy1go=; Received: from modemcable124.64-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.64.124]:50415 helo=BRIOGFOURNIER) by ecbiz156.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm34x-000CHa-Jk; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:05:11 -0500 From: "Guillaume Fournier" To: "'Otavio Salvador'" References: <000a01cff880$d8b22690$8a1673b0$@brioconcept.com> <006601cff906$1a17a170$4e46e450$@brioconcept.com> <008b01cff90e$5c5a8bd0$150fa370$@brioconcept.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:05:05 -0500 Message-ID: <009301cff912$44311a70$cc934f50$@brioconcept.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQKmmnTva9InJO+t6GG5EnVVZUvx/AJgL0tAAYIHMioB2KqVcwH+Iy2rAirZ4i2aVc3yAA== X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ecbiz156.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - brioconcept.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ecbiz156.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: gfournier@brioconcept.com Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Unable to get u-boot running on i.MX6 SABRE for Smart Devices Eval Board X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:05:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-ca >Did you read the README.imximage file? > >Check it here: > >https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-fslc/blob/patches-2014.10/doc/README= .imximage > >Short version: > >make u-boot.imx > I have read the document and burned the resulting .imx file to my SD = card like this: cfimager -f u-boot.imx -raw -offset 1024 -skip 1024 -d d It doesn't boot on the target. What am I missing ? I had a look at the .sdcard generated by Yocto that = does work on the target to look at the binary content. When comparing = it to a working .imx file, they are the same starting at offset 0x400. = This makes sense. When I compare my non-working .imx file with the = working .imx file (binary wise), I can see there are slight differences.