From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.janot@ateme.fr>
Received: from postman.ateme.net (postman.ateme.net [217.167.236.59])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD62682A3
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:11:04 +1000 (EST)
Received: from pc179 (pc-179.ateme.net [172.16.16.179])
	by postman.ateme.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C9164B8019
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:49:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <00a401c5b92a$c1315d50$b31010ac@pc179>
From: "Frederic Janot" <f.janot@ateme.fr>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:49:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: MPC5200 : BAPI versions & processor revision
Reply-To: Frederic Janot <f.janot@ateme.fr>
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi all,

I'm a bit confused about Bestcomm on MPC5200 and I need yours lights :)

Since a while, and I don't know why, I believe that Rev. A (L25R) and Rev.
B1 (M08A) of the MPC5200 processor can run well with BAPI v2.1. And with
Rev. B2 (M62C), we have to used BAPI v2.2.

Am I right or should I used BAPI v2.2 with all Rev B ?
Does BAPI v2.2 is backward compatible with Rev A ?

Thanks for your reply,

Frederic