RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC

["sunyeal.hong" <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>]

Hello Krzyszto,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 4:20 PM
> To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; Sylwester Nawrocki
> <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; Alim
> Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette
> <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob Herring
> <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC
> 
> On 07/10/2024 09:18, Sunyeal Hong wrote:
> > This patchset adds the CMU block below to support exynosauto v920 SoC.
> > - CMU_PERIC1
> > - CMU_MISC
> > - CMU_HSI0/1
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - Rebase the patch to reflect the latest fixes
> 
> Not much improved. Still blind rebase without addressing the issue I
> pointed out.
> 
> Allow people to actually review your patches, instead of sending multiple
> versions within 5 minutes.
> 
> One patchset per 24h.
> 
I apologize for sending you the patch version incorrectly multiple times.
Could you elaborate a bit more on the "unrelated change" part you mentioned in the comment?
I don't think I understand your exact intention.

Best Regards,
sunyeal

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>