From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Maciej Soltysiak" <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: status of reiser4
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:58:04 +0100
Message-ID: <00a601c4e4e8$1a962690$0e25fe0a@pysiak>
References: <41C322ED.4000807@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-22833-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii"; reply-type="response"
To: ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Hi,

> bundle a set of patches together, send them to andrew morton, and then 
> start a discussion on the changes to core kernel code that Hellweg and 
> company object to that currently prevent our inclusion.
That is nice.
Are we going to have patches for vanilla 2.6.10 for non -mm users?
I mean patches trivial to apply. Because the -mm tree contains lots of
r4 patches. And applying them in correct order may be troublesome.
Users really like one patch to be applied without unknown dependencies.


Maciej Soltysiak