From: Rupesh S <rupeshs@myw.ltindia.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Doubt on Kernel Linking
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 19:22:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a901c3219b$59d821d0$6706a8c0@SPLENDOR> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030523120730.83A13C6162@atlas.denx.de
I kept the link address back at 0xc0000000.
Doing mkimage , I did load address and entry address as 0x0.
On my FADS823 board, I do a download to 0x100000.
And gave a bootm 0x100000.
But the system hangs after Uncompressing Kernel Image...
Note: I have compared the bd_info stricture of linux and u-boot . It is the
same . Also the IMMR address.
I do mkimage on gzipped binary image of vmlinux.
Please advice.
Rupesh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de>
To: "Rupesh S" <rupeshs@myw.ltindia.com>
Cc: <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Doubt on Kernel Linking
> In message <006f01c3218b$b58a0d00$6706a8c0@SPLENDOR> you wrote:
> >
> > The RAM memroy map as seen with the "bdinfo" command in u-boot says..
> > 0x00000000 to 0x00800000.
>
> These are physical addresses.
>
> > I'm trying to boot linux kernel ( linux-2.4.4-2002-10-06 from DENX) on
> > my board.
> > By default , the kernel is build at 0xC0000000. (This memory is not
> > mapped by u-boot).
>
> This is a virtual address.
>
> > Do I have to change the kernel linking to a address that is within,
> > 0x00000000 and 0x00800000 ?
>
> No. You MUST NOT change the Linux kernel, or it will break.
> Physical and virtual addresses are completely different beasts.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
> We are Microsoft. Unix is irrelevant. Openness is futile. Prepare to
> be assimilated.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-24 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-24 0:30 [U-Boot-Users] Doubt on Kernel Linking Rupesh S
2003-05-23 12:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-24 2:22 ` Rupesh S [this message]
2003-05-23 13:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-26 18:38 ` Rupesh S
2003-05-26 6:50 ` Udi Finkelstein
2003-05-26 21:26 ` Rupesh S
2003-05-26 8:59 ` Udi Finkelstein
2003-05-27 0:14 ` Rupesh S
2003-05-26 11:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-26 7:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-23 12:08 Flavio Pereira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00a901c3219b$59d821d0$6706a8c0@SPLENDOR' \
--to=rupeshs@myw.ltindia.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.