From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
To: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"'Alessandro Zummo'" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, "'Jingoo Han'" <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/19] rtc: rtc-efi: remove erroneous __init/__exit annotations
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:40:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a901ce158f$49abb720$dd032560$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00a501ce158e$ef171610$cd454230$%han@samsung.com>
__init/__exit annotations for probe()/remove() are supposed to be
__devinit/__devexit, because __init/__exit for probe()/remove()
are not correct. However, __devinit/__devexit are not used,
because CONFIG_HOTPLUG was removed. Thus, these annotations
should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c
index 1a0c37c..71ac803 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops efi_rtc_ops = {
.set_alarm = efi_set_alarm,
};
-static int __init efi_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int efi_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
{
struct rtc_device *rtc;
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static int __init efi_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
return 0;
}
-static int __exit efi_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int efi_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
{
struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static struct platform_driver efi_rtc_driver = {
.name = "rtc-efi",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
- .remove = __exit_p(efi_rtc_remove),
+ .remove = efi_rtc_remove,
};
static int __init efi_rtc_init(void)
--
1.7.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-28 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 8:38 [PATCH 01/19] rtc: rtc-mv: remove erroneous __exit annotation Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:39 ` [PATCH 02/19] rtc: rtc-davinci: remove erroneous __init annotation Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:39 ` [PATCH 03/19] rtc: rtc-ds1302: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] rtc: omap: remove erroneous __init/__exit annotations Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:40 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2013-02-28 8:41 ` [PATCH 06/19] rtc: rtc-mc13xxx: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:41 ` [PATCH 07/19] rtc: rtc-ps3: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-02-28 9:36 ` Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:41 ` [PATCH 08/19] rtc: rtc-coh901331: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:42 ` [PATCH 09/19] rtc: rtc-pxa: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:42 ` [PATCH 10/19] rtc: rtc-rp5c01: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 11/19] rtc: rtc-at32ap700x: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 12/19] rtc: rtc-ab3100: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 13/19] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:44 ` [PATCH 14/19] rtc: msm6242: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:44 ` [PATCH 15/19] rtc: rtc-tx4939: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:45 ` [PATCH 16/19] rtc: rtc-sun4v: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:45 ` [PATCH 17/19] rtc: rtc-generic: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:46 ` [PATCH 18/19] rtc: rtc-sh: " Jingoo Han
2013-02-28 8:46 ` [PATCH 19/19] rtc: rtc-starfire: " Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00a901ce158f$49abb720$dd032560$%han@samsung.com' \
--to=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.