From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: Fix early queue flags settings
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:50:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00aa01d2141f$e1cd1020$a5673060$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5895eaad-a0e3-20be-f3e2-d4a02d4b8bfa@grimberg.me>
>
> >>> Maybe this changelog?
> >>>
> >>> nvme-rdma: only clear queue flags after successful connect
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise, nvme_rdma_stop_and_clear_queue() will incorrectly
> >>> try to stop/free rdma qps/cm_ids that are already freed.
> >>
> >> I can modify the change log, Christoph do you still want a
> >> comment in the code?
> >
> > Honestly there more I look into this the less I'm happy with the patch.
>
> I agree that we should really do a proper queue state machine.
>
> > queue->flags is an atomic, and as the patch shows we can get
> > nvme_rdma_init_queue caled on a queue that still has visibility in
> > other threads So I think we really should not even do that simple
> > queue->flags = 0 assignment at all. We'll need to use clear_bit to
> > atomically clear anything that might be set, and we need to be careful
> > where we do that. I think this whole situation that we can get an
> > *_init_* function called on something that already is live and visible
> > to other threads need to be well documented at least because it's just
> > waiting for sucker like me that don't expect that.
>
> I don't think its a multithreading issue. We aren't expected to get
> here concurrently from different contexts (I think we're screwed if we
> do). The issue was that we are not clearing the DELETING flag on
> reconnects causing possible leaks, then I "fixed" it by resetting the
> queue flags at init_queue start, the problem was that if we failed to
> init the queue we lost the DELETING flag and got to a use-after-free
> condition (nothing prevented stop_and_free_queue to make forward
> progress...
>
> I can move it to clear_bit if you want...
>
I'd like this in 4.8 to avoid the crash during reconnect. (the clear_bit()
is fine and tests ok).
I'll sign up to work with Sagi on a proper state machine fix for 4.9. How's
that sound?
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 18:57 [PATCH] nvme-rdma: Fix early queue flags settings Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-20 19:01 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-20 19:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-20 20:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-20 20:14 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 3:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-21 14:01 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2016-09-21 14:18 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 14:52 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 15:10 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 14:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-21 15:50 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2016-09-21 19:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00aa01d2141f$e1cd1020$a5673060$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.