From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Roy" Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:57:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Message-Id: <00bc01c3e55b$3964fc50$030aa8c0@t> List-Id: References: <50F73B338A7FD943B7937BBCF99BFBDE33B0D5@mail.sofaware.com> In-Reply-To: <50F73B338A7FD943B7937BBCF99BFBDE33B0D5@mail.sofaware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > As was mentioned before: the netfilter framework itself is able to drop > packets without negative side effects. So this should also be possible > for IMQ (or any other network device driver). > Well, this needs to be tested. I will try nerfilter module which can drop each n-th packet. I wonder what will happen. At least policer was not sucessfull for dropping packets. Basicaly all this could be fixed if to find a way to tell kernel that device is busy and dont want more data. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/