All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@redtone.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] QoS for VoIP
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:00:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00bc01c803c6$6deb8a60$0100a8c0@MingChing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-107000832316611@msgid-missing>


From: "Santiago" <santiago@elportal.net.ec>

> If you have for example 1024 Kbps, you have to create a class (maybe htb)
> about 920Kpbs to create the queue. Then you have to attach the prio qdisc
to
> this class, mark the voip packets and send to class :1 in the prio qdisc.
>

That's what I am talking about. You said it **VERY** easily that "If you
have for example 1024 Kbps, you have to create a class about 920 Kbps ...".

But what's the reality. The reality is that you might not have
a 1024 Kbps link, even though the ISP you sign up with might
claim that. You don't know for sure. Even perhaps for most of
the days you have 1024 Kbps, certain peak hours you might
be clamped down to a lower figure due to congestion at the
BRAS of the ISP.

And how do you arrive at your magic figure of 920 kbps ?

And bear in mind that most ADSL are asymmetric, your uplink
is usually lower than your downlink. Even if you clamp down
your down link, if you don't police ( or rate limit ) your uplink,
you still can't really control the link. So in practice you will
actually police the rate of download to a figure slightly smaller
than your uplink speed. There you can see, your overall throughput
of the internet (download ) is significantly slowed down.




_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-01  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-28  8:12 [LARTC] QoS for VoIP Craig Main
2003-11-28 18:05 ` Kilian Krause
2007-09-27  2:31 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2007-09-27 16:05 ` Santiago
2007-09-28  1:09 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2007-09-28  2:45 ` Santiago
2007-09-28 14:07 ` Santiago
2007-10-01  1:00 ` Ming-Ching Tiew [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-16 15:19 [LARTC] QoS for Voip Alessandro Ren
2004-07-16 15:53 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-07-16 16:54 ` Jason Boxman
2004-07-16 17:51 ` ibro tj
2004-07-16 18:38 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-07-19 12:45 ` Alessandro Ren
2004-07-19 13:19 ` Andreas Klauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00bc01c803c6$6deb8a60$0100a8c0@MingChing' \
    --to=mingching.tiew@redtone.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.