From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nyamul Hassaan" Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:49:28 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] VPN Solution Message-Id: <00be01c74807$1d7b9dc0$58c170cb@isprossrv02> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1265739242==" List-Id: References: <45629969.9050208@riverviewtech.net> In-Reply-To: <45629969.9050208@riverviewtech.net> To: lartc@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1265739242== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C74839.6166A0C0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C74839.6166A0C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greeting List Members, I'm not sure if what I want to do is possible at all. I have an office = network (ONet) with 3 uplinks. Each of these ISPs give me a block of = /26 to /29 IP addresses, as my needs / demands are. Now, I have a remote server (RS) hosted in a data center, which = communicates between several hosts in my office. What we want to do is = encrypt the data being transferred between RS and ONet. We already established a IPSEC tunnel between RS and ONet through 1 of = the uplinks. Is it possible to have 3 different IPSEC tunnels through = the 3 uplinks, and then have a load balancing between the 3? We have also taken a /26 block from the data center provider, and have = routed the /26 through the IPSEC to our ONet. Can we have the same /26 = use the 3 uplinks configured as IPSEC tunnels and load balance between = them? If you need any more explanation, I would be happy to provide that. Regards HASSAAN ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C74839.6166A0C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greeting List Members,
 
I'm not sure if what I want to do is = possible at=20 all.  I have an office network (ONet) with 3 uplinks.  Each of = these=20 ISPs give me a block of /26 to /29 IP addresses, as my needs / demands=20 are.
 
Now, I have a remote server (RS) hosted = in a data=20 center, which communicates between several hosts in my office.  = What we=20 want to do is encrypt the data being transferred between RS and=20 ONet.
 
We already established a IPSEC tunnel = between RS=20 and ONet through 1 of the uplinks.  Is it possible to have 3 = different=20 IPSEC tunnels through the 3 uplinks, and then have a load balancing = between the=20 3?
 
We have also taken a /26 block from the = data center=20 provider, and have routed the /26 through the IPSEC to our ONet.  = Can we=20 have the same /26 use the 3 uplinks configured as IPSEC tunnels and load = balance=20 between them?
 
If you need any more explanation, I = would be happy=20 to provide that.
 
Regards
HASSAAN
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C74839.6166A0C0-- --===============1265739242== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc --===============1265739242==--