All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <me@heyjay.com>
To: Guy <bugzilla@watkins-home.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sync rates?
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:54:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c201c4347d$d50ea680$6705a8c0@a30> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200405070624.i476OKB17105@www.watkins-home.com

Cable problems, I suspect this is more to ones liking?

platinum:/mnt/config# ./ddtest

time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
655360000 bytes transferred in 12.050804 seconds (54383093 bytes/sec)

real    0m12.058s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m1.780s
time dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
655360000 bytes transferred in 11.508676 seconds (56944865 bytes/sec)

real    0m11.510s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m1.670s


What exactly am I testing here though?  I'm only testing write speed not
read speed, correct?  Is there an analogous test for reads?

Thanks
Jay

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guy" <bugzilla@watkins-home.com>
To: <me@heyjay.com>
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: Sync rates?


> I don't understand what's wrong with your disks.  If you can, configure
one
> as a master without a slave.  Then time it.
>
> My disks are slow/old SCSI disks.  The max speed is about 19Meg/second.
> Today's disks are much faster.
> The reason my disks are as slow as 4000-5000K /sec is that I have 7 of
them
> on a 40M/sec SCSI bus.
> I checked my notes, the speed is just over 5000K/sec.
> If I were to upgrade the SCSI card to a LVD (80M/sec) I would get about
> 10000K/sec.  I did that once with a barrowed card.  Was very cool.
> My disks are Seagate ST118202LC or SX118282LS, depending on where I look!
> 18Gig, 10,000RPM.  Good seek time, but slow sustained transfer rate.
>
> Guy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: me@heyjay.com [mailto:me@heyjay.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 1:29 AM
> To: Guy; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Sync rates?
>
> Weird, seems as if the faster the processor the longer the test takes.  I
> ran it on 2 other machines, in addition to the one with raid.  Here are
the
> results.  What type of disks are you using?  Your results are almost twice
> as fast as my fastest (which is machine 3 i.e. my slowest chip speed).
>
> Jay
>
> Machine 1 (the one in question), AMD 3200, 1 GB RAM, Disks on individual
IDE
> channels
> platinum:~# df
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/md0              19686680   1195512  17491132   7% /
> tmpfs                   452284         0    452284   0% /dev/shm
> /dev/md1              39373624     32844  37340696   1% /opt
> /dev/md2              39373624     32848  37340692   1% /home
> /dev/md4              14974680     32872  14181136   1% /usr/local
>
> platinum:~# time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 166.335481 seconds (3939989 bytes/sec)
>
> real    2m46.336s
> user    0m0.004s
> sys     2m13.280s
>
>
> platinum:~# time dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 171.632623 seconds (3818388 bytes/sec)
>
> real    2m51.634s
> user    0m0.004s
> sys     1m33.162s
>
> # Machine 2, PII 400 Mhz, the disks are master/slave
> meir:~# df
> Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda4              4806936   1220040   3342708  27% /
> /dev/hda1                46636       935     43293   3% /boot
> /dev/hda5              4996728    938156   3804748  20% /home
> /dev/hda6              3937220   2026628   1710588  55% /usr
> /dev/hdb2              9843308   8246848   1096440  89% /opt
> au:/usr/local/src     29530400   6731216  21299120  25% /usr/local/src
>
> meir:~# time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
>
> real    2m48.300s
> user    0m0.030s
> sys     1m49.000s
>
> Machine 1, PPro 180 Mhz, Master/Slave
> abba:~# df
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda1              9851308   2534948   6815940  28% /
> tmpfs                   258204         0    258204   0% /dev/shm
> /dev/hda3              7842996   3502032   3942552  48% /mnt/hda3
>
>
> abba:~# time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 56.396242 seconds (11620632 bytes/sec)
>
> real    0m56.416s
> user    0m0.120s
> sys     0m11.960s
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Guy" <bugzilla@watkins-home.com>
> To: <me@heyjay.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 9:44 PM
> Subject: RE: Sync rates?
>
>
> > My system re-builds at 4000-5000K/sec/disk.  It has 14 disks.
> > During a re-build the CPU load is below 5%.
> > I have 2 CPUs, P3-500Mhz, 512Meg ram.
> > During a re-build I don't notice any slowdown.  I had a disk fail and it
> > re-build on the spare.  I did not know until hours after it was done.
> >
> > If you cat /proc/mdstat it will show the re-build rate.
> > That rate is per disk, not an overall total.
> >
> > I would say your system has problems!
> > Test each disk with dd.
> > This is a read test!!
> >
> > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
> >
> > This should take less than a minute (34.6 seconds for me).
> > If the above gives the same results on each disk, drop the count=10000.
> >
> > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k
> >
> > Without the count=10000 it will read 100% of the disk, this may take an
> hour
> > or more.
> > It will report a record count.
> > Do this math to determine the speed in K per second.
> > Records*64/number of seconds
> >
> > Replace "hda" with whatever is correct for you.
> > Do this for each disk.
> > I bet you find 1 disk is much slower than the others.
> > Maybe a bad cable, don't know.
> >
> > Good luck,
> > Guy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of me@heyjay.com
> > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:02 PM
> > To: Paul Clements
> > Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: Sync rates?
> >
> > My machine was idle during the rebuild.  When I say idle, I mean no one
> > logged in, no user processes running (except me sshed into the box), no
> > database, no I/O other than the rebuild.
> >
> > While the rebuild was going on my system was debilitated, totally slow
to
> > respond to ssh commands
> >
> > Jay
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Paul Clements" <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
> > To: <me@heyjay.com>
> > Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: Sync rates?
> >
> >
> > > me@heyjay.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > platinum:~# cat /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min
> > > > 1000
> > > > platinum:~# cat /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
> > > > 200000
> > >  > Are these acceptable?
> > >
> > > Well, those values are in KB/s. And, your resync rate is about:
> > >
> > > 120000000 / ( 24 * 60 * 60 ) = 1388 KB/s
> > >
> > > if my calculations are correct. I'd try bumping the min value up to
say
> > > 10000 and see if that speeds things up. Is there much I/O activity on
> > > the system? That will slow down a resync quite a bit, too.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


       reply	other threads:[~2004-05-07 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200405070624.i476OKB17105@www.watkins-home.com>
2004-05-07 21:54 ` me [this message]
     [not found] <200405070244.i472iHB15917@www.watkins-home.com>
2004-05-07  5:28 ` Sync rates? me
2004-05-06 19:15 me
2004-05-06 19:32 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-06 19:40   ` Paul Clements
2004-05-06 19:50     ` me
2004-05-06 19:59       ` Paul Clements
2004-05-07  2:01         ` me
2004-05-12 18:04       ` Eric Wood
2004-05-06 19:48   ` me

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00c201c4347d$d50ea680$6705a8c0@a30' \
    --to=me@heyjay.com \
    --cc=bugzilla@watkins-home.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.