From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmzoI-0004kl-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:52:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmzoE-000849-HG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:52:18 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:12479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmzoE-00083a-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:52:14 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NWA00HKUZ6ZUD50@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:52:11 +0100 (BST) From: Pavel Fedin References: <010601d10747$569ae800$03d0b800$@samsung.com> <00a501d107dd$7fd8b350$7f8a19f0$@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:52:10 +0300 Message-id: <00ce01d107e7$90879720$b196c560$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-language: ru Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm_gic_kvm: Disable live migration if not supported List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 'Peter Maydell' Cc: 'QEMU Developers' Hello! > But this is the GICv2 code. Unless there are kernels out in the wild > which support v2 but not migration, there's no need to check > for that situation here. Such kernels do exist for sure, otherwise why do we have = kvm_gic_can_save_restore() at all? I remember even you pointed me at it. I've just checked LXR, we have vGIC support since 3.11, but = KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2 was introduced only in 3.14. P.S. While studying migration code i discovered migrate_add_blocker(), = i guess i need to use it instead of patching VMState, because checkpatch = blames me for making it non-const. So, if you ACK the idea itself, i'll = reimplement it and post v2. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia