From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:32:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:32:49 -0500 Received: from 12-211-138-234.client.attbi.com ([12.211.138.234]:33586 "EHLO vlad.geekizoid.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:32:49 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Vlad@geekizoid.com" To: "'Nicolas Mailhot'" Cc: "Lkml \(E-mail\)" Subject: RE: openbkweb-0.0 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:42:44 -0600 Message-ID: <00dd01c2d532$cb0a0db0$0200a8c0@wsl3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <1045336342.1195.25.camel@rousalka> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The amazing thing to me is that I don't see Larry making any threats. It's more like pleading "Please let us continue to do this great thing, and don't torpedo my company out of some misguided idea that BK should be free just because you don't want to have to pay for it."