From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree binding Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:05:45 +0300 Message-ID: <00df01d17908$f06bc930$d1435b90$@samsung.com> References: <1456389222-12738-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1456389222-12738-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20160302175319.GA11155@rob-hp-laptop> <56DA63A6.80703@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:39130 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754034AbcCHHFv (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 02:05:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <56DA63A6.80703@samsung.com> Content-language: en-us Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: "'pankaj.dubey'" , 'Rob Herring' Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com, olof@lixom.net, 'Mark Rutland' , 'Ian Campbell' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 'Kukjin Kim' Hello! >> BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to >> maintain authorship? >OK. Will squash both of these patches, unless Pavel do not any objections. I don't. Kind regards. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.fedin@samsung.com (Pavel Fedin) Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:05:45 +0300 Subject: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree binding In-Reply-To: <56DA63A6.80703@samsung.com> References: <1456389222-12738-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1456389222-12738-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20160302175319.GA11155@rob-hp-laptop> <56DA63A6.80703@samsung.com> Message-ID: <00df01d17908$f06bc930$d1435b90$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello! >> BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to >> maintain authorship? >OK. Will squash both of these patches, unless Pavel do not any objections. I don't. Kind regards.