All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dieter Nützel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:01:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01012905010901.00697@SunWave1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01012904435200.00697@SunWave1> <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>

Am Montag, 29. Januar 2001 04:46 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix.
> >
> >         high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3;
> >         low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2;
> >         if (low_queued_sectors < 0)
> >                 low_queued_sectors = total_ram / 2;
> >
> >         /*
> >          * for big RAM machines (>= 384MB), use more for I/O
> >          */
> >         /*
> >         if (total_ram >= MB(384)) {
> >                 high_queued_sectors = (total_ram * 4) / 5;
> >                 low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors - MB(128);
> >         }
> >         */
> >
> > Shouldn't it be clean for a 2.4.1 release?
>
> With enough swap the numbers I saw were not conclusive. I promised
> to test which I haven't gotten done yet, I will do this tomorrow
> and make sure we have the right ratios. However, I don't think
> the pre11 numbers are much off - do you have any results?

I have 256 MB RAM and 200 MB swap but nothing of the later was used during 
"dbench 48". It was nothing spectacular but a litte bit faster with the above.
Attention: Results only from memory...;-)

Good night.
	Dieter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-29  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-29  3:43 Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric? Dieter Nützel
2001-01-29  3:46 ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-29  4:01   ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-29 11:56 Petr Vandrovec
2001-01-29 15:12 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01012905010901.00697@SunWave1 \
    --to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.