From: Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 02:03:09 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01020202030905.00595@dyp.perchine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx> <3A79C156.A8F7FF58@dawa.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3A79C156.A8F7FF58@dawa.demon.co.uk>
On Friday 02 February 2001 02:04, Paul Flinders wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
> >
> > Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or
> > is their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting
> > the specweb dyanmic stuff in x86 assembly in their microkernel? :)
>
> Yeah, but Tux 2 is still faster on the same/similar hardware
Yeps. But there was no access time update turned off in its case. MS do this.
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-01 19:38 NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance? Gregory Maxwell
2001-02-01 20:04 ` Paul Flinders
2001-02-01 20:03 ` Denis Perchine [this message]
2001-02-02 14:50 ` Michael Poole
2001-02-01 20:18 ` Walter Hofmann
2001-02-01 21:28 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01020202030905.00595@dyp.perchine.com \
--to=dyp@perchine.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.