All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell Coker <bofh@coker.com.au>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, "S. Michael Denton" <smdenton@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Apparent performance degradation for each PV with striping
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:58:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0103220958130N.00851@lyta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01C0B04F.5EFB3400.smdenton@bellsouth.net>

On Monday 19 March 2001 14:34, S. Michael Denton wrote:
> I tend to agree.  In general software RAID will bog the system down
> and if performance is key, you should take the load off the CPU
> whereever possible.  The obvious conclusion with data volumes is to
> use a hardware RAID controller, beit SCSI or IDE... I've used both
> SCSI raid controllers and the IDE promise raid controller with good
> results.  The other thing that may be killing your performance is IO
> contention.  Check for other highly-used devices on the same PCI
> bus... on PCs there are quite a few points of possible contention.

That really depends on the type of card.  There are many hardware RAID 
devices out there that have significant limits on performance (they give less 
performance from an array of 10000rpm Ultra2-SCSI drives than you expect from 
a single ATA drive).

Hardware RAID controllers that have a CPU that is less than 100MHz in speed, 
or that don't have battery backed cache for write-back caching tend to 
deliver less performance than you hope for.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/     Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/       Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/     My home page

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-03-22  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-19 13:34 [linux-lvm] Apparent performance degradation for each PV with striping S. Michael Denton
2001-03-19 13:44 ` Steven Lembark
2001-03-22  8:54   ` Russell Coker
2001-03-22  9:53     ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-03-22 12:19     ` zoo1
2001-03-22  8:58 ` Russell Coker [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-19  5:11 Donald Thompson
2001-03-19  5:20 ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-03-22  8:55   ` Russell Coker
2001-03-19  6:03 ` lvm
2001-03-19  7:05   ` Donald Thompson
2001-03-19  9:15     ` Joe Thornber
2001-03-19  7:06   ` Jason Walker
2001-03-19  8:48 ` Oleg Volkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0103220958130N.00851@lyta \
    --to=bofh@coker.com.au \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    --cc=smdenton@bellsouth.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.