From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265087AbUFWCnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:43:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266081AbUFWCnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:43:43 -0400 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:2240 "EHLO pd4mo1so.prod.shaw.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265087AbUFWCnl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:43:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:38:50 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: Don't want to share interrupts To: linux-kernel Message-id: <010601c458cb$5ea2cef0$6401a8c0@northbrook> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Only reason I can see for the IRQ allocation to be different is that one OS is using APIC and the other is not.. ----- Original Message ----- From: Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel To: Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 7:38 AM Subject: Don't want to share interrupts > I have been trying to get some platforms to work with a quad port > Ethernet card. > Some hardware is OK, others...well, not so OK. > > An IBM x335 works OK under Linux (2.4.9) and Win2K3 > An IBM x365 Does not work under Linux. > > Looks like Linux shares an IRQ between all 4 ports whereas win2k3 > doesn't .... each is assigned it's own IRQ. Is there anyway to > duplicate this behavior under Linux? (i.e. have an IRQ assigned to each > port instead of sharing one for the whole card?). > > Thanks, > > -Garreth- > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/